Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted June 24, 2016 Author Share Posted June 24, 2016 You were about to rehash something that means nothing. #ClassicJoeOutdatedTwist #InternetThug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquaria Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 DP Yes please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquaria Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 Oh God Norman let it go. Christ!!! We get it you think he was a creep and weird. You continue to bait ppl over sum events that happen 20+ something yrs ago. Its ANCIENT. He's GONE. SO WHO the fuck cares. Thats soooo.. like, find something to do cus it looks ridiculous to keep kicking that same damn horse that you have been kicking for yrsss on this forum. WE. GET.IT!!!He's trying to make jerky outta that dead horse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 lmao I was about to read down and then I thought of you so that's why I left it at just that lolyall beating a dead horse wit JT the way Norman beats the shit out of the horse with MJ. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VelvetKnowledge1814 Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 (edited) http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-artist-photo-michael-jackson-1.3651598?cmp=rssA new article regarding this just released. An artist has completely debunked the story. Radar must have added his photo to the PDF files in order to make the story even more salacious. Honestly, the whole thing is ridiculous Edited June 25, 2016 by VelvetKnowledge1814 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 Yes please well do u have vasoline? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dal Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-artist-photo-michael-jackson-1.3651598?cmp=rssA new article regarding this just released. An artist has completely debunked the story. Radar must have added his photo to the PDF files in order to make the story even more salacious. Honestly, the whole thing is ridiculous so supposedly some of these "weird" photos that MJ allegedly had weren't even in existence until 2008, and the Radar article is saying these things were found in the 2003 police raid..?? So someone intentionally inserted these pictures into that police report as if they were taken in 2003..wtf media!? ?? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VelvetKnowledge1814 Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 so supposedly some of these "weird" photos that MJ allegedly had weren't even in existence until 2008, and the Radar article is saying these things were found in the 2003 police raid..?? So someone intentionally inserted these pictures into that police report as if they were taken in 2003..wtf media!? ??You know what else is interesting? I glanced at the PDF files the day Radar released them. The total amount of pages was 88. Now, I haven't been back to the site since, but I've heard from other MJ fans that they took down the PDF files and then put them back up. When they did, it was 27 pages shorter. I believe the person I read this from is named '@sanemjfan' on Twitter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VelvetKnowledge1814 Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 Hate to keep replying but this is another interesting video on the 2005 trial. It's a reading of an article: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dal Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 You know what else is interesting? I glanced at the PDF files the day Radar released them. The total amount of pages was 88. Now, I haven't been back to the site since, but I've heard from other MJ fans that they took down the PDF files and then put them back up. When they did, it was 27 pages shorter. I believe the person I read this from is named '@sanemjfan' on Twitternow see when I read the docs (on radar same day they were first posted), I think I remember them being only 61 pages..something is definitely up with this whole scenario.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 Can't the estate sue for the adding of false information? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VelvetKnowledge1814 Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 I really hope the estate takes legal action. MJ's nephews appear to be trying to do something though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted June 26, 2016 Author Share Posted June 26, 2016 (edited) Can't the estate sue for the adding of false information?I really hope the estate takes legal action. MJ's nephews appear to be trying to do something though.According to the Internet, the estate can try but will ultimately fail bc... Well he's dead and the non-living do not have rights in the eye of the law. It would be a waste of resources to attempt to bring a libel case against anyone. The historical reason for allowing claims for slander and libel is to protect the person's reputation and thus his or her ability to earn a living and enjoy the benefits of good standing in the community. Once the person is dead, those concerns go away. In some states, even if the person who was defamed sued for libel or slander and died before the case went to judgment, the action would be dismissed. Edited June 26, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laveaux Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 Lets not on my fav,Joe he shaded you at the same damn time...lol..i miss this forum sometimes. Game, you are wrong as MJ nose for this thread and there is a special place in Dirty Diana hell reserved for haters like you where you will be attacked by a thousand Bens and butt-fucked by the Thriller werewolf...now thats some violent pornagraphy for that ass. I didnt care for MJ much myself, but let the dead rest and anyone with sense can see this is some bullshit! 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted June 26, 2016 Author Share Posted June 26, 2016 Game, there is a special place in hell Great! Now I'm getting coal from Santa Claus and the tooth fairy and other fictitious shit that I'm too old to care about. All I did was post something from FB.. It's been proven false and I changed the thread title to reflect that... Not sure how I'm an MJ hater but okay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeJoe Posted June 27, 2016 Share Posted June 27, 2016 (edited) he shaded you at the same damn time...lol..i miss this forum sometimes. Game, you are wrong as MJ nose for this thread and there is a special place in Dirty Diana hell reserved for haters like you where you will be attacked by a thousand Bens and butt-fucked by the Thriller werewolf...now thats some violent pornagraphy for that ass. I didnt care for MJ much myself, but let the dead rest and anyone with sense can see this is some bullshit!Well Edited June 27, 2016 by JoeJoe 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.