Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) http://huff.to/2g6ioEMTL;dr: Jill Stein is challenging the results of three state Trump did well in despite them being majority democratic; Wisconsin, Michigan, & Pennsylvania. She raised her $2 million goal in hours thanks to her FB Live Post. The $2 million covers most costs including lawyer & recounting State feesJill will have to submit it separately and each state will have to approve a recount. Stay tuned. Computer Scientists urged Hillary Clinton's campaign to challenge these result in these three states. Jill Stein is doing it instead (makes sense) Edited November 29, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Changing the results of three states, sadly, won't change the outcome though will it? Unless it leads to a major recount all over the place, which I doubt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Author Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) Changing the results of three states, sadly, won't change the outcome though will it? Unless it leads to a major recount all over the place, which I doubt. Yes. The electoral college would go to Hillary and she would win the election if voting booths were tampered or hacked Trump hasn't been sworn in yet and the electoral collage hasn't voted yet so his Presidency is in jeopardy if these Computer Scientists were right Edited November 24, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Yes. The electoral college would go to Hillary and she would win the election in a perfect world. Trump hasn't been sworn in yet and the electoral collage hasn't voted yet so his Presidency is in jeopardy if these Computer Sciebtists were rightJill Stein better werk then! I heard they reached the budget they need for this? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) Actually Hilliary would have to have proof there was hacking as Game stated, but she would have to overturn all the states in question. If there were irregularities, can she say they were across the board? Which is unlikely, thanks to our system of the electoral college different states have different amounts of "votes" to declare a "winner" the problem here is the math doesn't add up. In short, for HIllary to have a shot at being the "winner" she would have to sweep all states involved, and thats not going to happen. Sadly..... Edited November 24, 2016 by Bailey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Author Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) If the electoral collage is reversed in Pennsylvania or Wisconsin, Trump loses 30 points putting him at 260 (needs 270 to win) and giving Hillary 262. With a recount in Michigan, whom has yet to award a winner, Hillary could win the election. Edited November 24, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Author Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) Actually Hilliary would have to have proof there was hacking as Game stated, but she would have to overturn all the states in question. If there were irregularities, can she say they were across the board? Which is unlikely, thanks to our system of the electoral college different states have different amounts of "votes" to declare a "winner" the problem here is the math doesn't add up. In short, for HIllary to have a shot at being the "winner" she would have to sweep all states involved, and thats not going to happen. Sadly.....Hillary is not involved in this recount and does not have to have proof. Computer scientists urged the Clinton Campaign to do what Jill Stein is doing. Which is basically recounting the votes. Jill Stein doesn't need proof.. just $$$ and approval from the State Edited November 24, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Hillary is not involved in this recount and does not have to have proof. Computer scientists urged the Clinton Campaign to do what Jill Stein is doing. Which is basically recounting the votes. Jill Stein doesn't need proof.. just $$$ and approval from the State My point is if the Clinton campaign aren't contesting this themselves, the one party involved that has the most to gain here, there's a limit of momentum here, who will root of HIlliary more than Hilliary and still be president Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Author Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) My point is if the Clinton campaign aren't contesting this themselves, the one party involved that has the most to gain here, there's a limit of momentum here, who will root of HIlliary more than Hilliary and still be presidentNo. The Clinton Campaign doesn't need to contest this themselves for the results to be challenged/changed/amended. It's smart that Jill Stein challenged these results bc she has nothing to lose Momentum doesn't win recounts. You can't hype pieces of paper Edited November 24, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 No. The Clinton Campaign doesn't need to contest this themselves for the results to be challenged/changed/amended. It's smart that Jill Stein challenged these results bc she has nothing to lose Momentum doesn't win recounts. You can't hype pieces of papermomentum gets things done and accomplished, in order to do recounts you also will need a large multi-state effort to accomplish the end goal, which is to alter the election outcome. If were not trying to stop Trump then what does anyone stand to gain with a recount in some states maybe changing their outcome? Not a dayum thang Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Author Share Posted November 24, 2016 momentum gets things done and accomplished, in order to do recounts you also will need a large multi-state effort to accomplish the end goal, which is to alter the election outcome. If were not trying to stop Trump then what does anyone stand to gain with a recount in some states maybe changing their outcome? Not a dayum thang I don't think you're getting it. In order to do recounts, you need money and to make the deadline set out by the state.. not momentum. This isn't a re-vote, this is a recount. Stein is not attempting to alter the election. She's wants to ensure the integrity of the election.This isn't some anti-Trump movement and it shouldn't be one. It's about the integrity of the US Election Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) I don't think you're getting it. In order to do recounts, you need money and to make the deadline set out by the state.. not momentum. This isn't a re-vote, this is a recount. Stein is not attempting to alter the election. She's wants to ensure the integrity of the election.This isn't some anti-Trump movement and it shouldn't be one. It's about the integrity of the US Electionand what you dont get is from what I can ascertain, the United States are so divided over this election, even teasing us with a challegne to electoral "intregrity" only picks at a festering sore if it doesnt change the outcome, the outcome is the problem 49& of Americans are grappling with, along with a Trump presidency very busy assembling the most fucked up cabinet since ever ask Kidfresh, they're making a modern day "Legend of Doom" people are still in their feelings over this election. Edited November 24, 2016 by Bailey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Author Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) I'm not sure what you're talking about but let's get back on track Stein is crowdsourcing the recount in these three states. There's an extremely small chance that these votes were corrupted but it's worth recounting to ensure that this election was won fairly and without outside international interference in accordance with Computer Scientists Edited November 24, 2016 by Game 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquaria Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Just heard about this as well. It looks like it was tampered with. It should be verified. Her popular vote margin is OVER 2 MILLION. We should not be robbed of our rightful president. They need to recount and the goddamn electoral college better elect her regardless. Fuck this racist backwards scum! Defend America for fuck's sake! This is the will of the people! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 24, 2016 Author Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) Trump won 7% the counties that used a computerized voting booth Hillary won paper and scan-sheet ballots from my understanding Edited November 24, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 26, 2016 Author Share Posted November 26, 2016 Wisconsin is a go ahead and will start the recounting process later next week. If there any discrepancies, expect Wisconsin to turn Blue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquaria Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Wisconsin is a go ahead and will start the recounting process later next week. If there any discrepancies, expect Wisconsin to turn Blue She raised enough for Pennsylvania too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 26, 2016 Author Share Posted November 26, 2016 She raised enough for Pennsylvania too. I believe PA has less of a threshold to cross than Wisconsin. It's like $1 million or so. Same goes with Michigan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted November 26, 2016 Author Share Posted November 26, 2016 (edited) Hillary's campaign lawyer has joined in on the recount... Hillary Campaign will not support the recount monetarily in any way.Trump claims it's dumb or something Edited November 29, 2016 by Game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kishi Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Recounts taking place in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Nevada.http://fortune.com/2016/12/05/presidential-vote-recount-wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-nevada/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted December 6, 2016 Author Share Posted December 6, 2016 Meh at Nevada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquaria Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Yassss. Poor Donald! What a loser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted December 6, 2016 Author Share Posted December 6, 2016 Yassss. Poor Donald! What a loser. I don't think we should take these recounts too seriously though but we should pay attention. I'm afraid that this [second to last] attempt is just hot air 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.