• Announcements

    • Planet Janet Rules   07/07/2015

      General Rules for Planet Janet Welcome to Planet Janet! The main objective of this board is to express your love for Janet, your opinions, and to interact with an important segment of the Janet fandom.  To enjoy your experience here, below are general rules and guidelines to make your experience here be successful: The N Word Please be aware that the N word is going to be filtered on this forum. Most importantly, this word is not acceptable on this forum in any form; therefore, if it is used again by ANY member on here, it will result in an immediate and permanent ban. Consider this the first, only, and last warning regarding this. Music Download | Copyright Infringement Illegal download links to music from any artist are not permissible to be posted on this forum at any time. If you have posted an illegal download link, you must take it down immediately. Failure to remove the links, and/or subsequent, repeated offenses will result in disciplinary action up to and including a permanent ban from the forum. Fan Threads of Other Artists Generally, we like to keep threads and/or topics about other artists within an Official Artist Thread.  This helps to eliminate clutter and redundancy throughout the forum and allow a one-stop shop to view comments on that particular artist not pertaining to Janet.  If there is HUGE news related to an artist and generates a lot of discussion, it is okay to have a standalone thread on that topic outside of the Official Thread. A good debate is OKAY in the Official Threads of other artists.  Official Threads are not complete sanctuaries of devotion of that particular artist; however, there is a need to be civil with other members.  Please refrain from personal attacks and arguments that devolve into personal attacks. Additionally, do NOT use Janet as means to defend an artist.  This forum is made in her honor, and putting her down to boast your particular artist is prohibited. Exercise good judgment and common sense.  If not, then the moderating team will exercise disciplinary action depending on the egregiousness of the action.  Please utilize this announcement as a first warning. Personal Attacks

      Each member has a warning percentage - most of them are at zero right now but a few have been warned before. Each warning is worth 10%, and once it gets to 100% the member is automatically banned from the forum. 

      Each time a member gets into an argument with another member that includes personal attacks, if it is reported or viewed by a member of the moderating team, each participant in the personal attack will get an increase in their warning percentage.  They will be notified via PM, and, prior to posting again, will receive a receipt acknowledging that warning before they can post again. The Moderating Team will never divulge a member's warn percentages on the forum or to other members.

      What this means is you are now responsible for your own future on this forum. The Moderating Team will not keep asking you to stop and being ignored. Learn to let things go and learn to moderate yourself before posting; if you end up banned it will be your own fault. Personal attacks and include attacks on one’s race, age, religious creed, color, gender, national origin, physical, mental or visual disability, medical condition, ancestry, marital and military status, pregnancy or sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and general physical appearance/looks. Depending on the nature of the personal attack there will be corrective action up and including permanent banning. If you have any inquiries about your warning percentage, feel free to PM a mod for an answer. If you need any clarification on the rules, feel free to reach out to The Moderating Team.
       
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Janet has separated from Wissam.

218 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

I have a hard time believing that after suffering physical and emotional abuse from James, foolishness and betrayal from Rene and whatever the hell Mauldin did to cause their relationship to end that, Janet would really deal with a husband that was controlling. All before Janet was young and broken and not used to dating but when she got with Wissam she was grown AF and healed from all the hurt in her past. It just doesn't make sense to me that after going through all of that growth, she would find her self back in the same type of unhealthy relationship. So, if that was the case; if he was "controlling," then maybe he did just become controlling throughout her pregnancy and into the beginning of little E's life. Otherwise, I don't believe it. At all.

 

Granted, we are creatures of habit. And we seek what we're used to because its comfortable, but no. She's too self aware for that shit. I just don't see it. 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I have a hard time believing that after suffering physical and emotional abuse from James, foolishness and betrayal from Rene and whatever the hell Mauldin did to cause their relationship to end that, Janet would really deal with a husband that was controlling. All before Janet was young and broken and not used to dating but when she got with Wissam she was grown AF and healed from all the hurt in her past. It just doesn't make sense to me that after going through all of that growth, she would find her self back in the same type of unhealthy relationship. So, if that was the case; if he was "controlling," then maybe he did just become controlling throughout her pregnancy and into the beginning of little E's life. Otherwise, I don't believe it. At all.

 

Granted, we are creatures of habit. And we seek what we're used to because its comfortable, but no. She's too self aware for that shit. I just don't see it. 

Never heard James physically abused her...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

I have a hard time believing that after suffering physical and emotional abuse from James, foolishness and betrayal from Rene and whatever the hell Mauldin did to cause their relationship to end that, Janet would really deal with a husband that was controlling. All before Janet was young and broken and not used to dating but when she got with Wissam she was grown AF and healed from all the hurt in her past. It just doesn't make sense to me that after going through all of that growth, she would find her self back in the same type of unhealthy relationship. So, if that was the case; if he was "controlling," then maybe he did just become controlling throughout her pregnancy and into the beginning of little E's life. Otherwise, I don't believe it. At all.

 

Granted, we are creatures of habit. And we seek what we're used to because its comfortable, but no. She's too self aware for that shit. I just don't see it. 

look Janet from what we can tell is submissive in some ways, its funny Im saying this but back when she did NYC Gay Pride in 2004-5 she yelled out "where my bottoms at? Im a bottom too" :lol: Janet probably wanted a man around to handle things she even said in an interview that she was thankful for him being "the man he is" and she emphasized man. Do I think it was clear from the beginning of their relationship? No and maybe it wasn't there at first, romance has a way of turning into something else, relationships can flower and grow, or wither away. You just never know what is going to occur until it does.

Can you blame a woman for wanting to be taken care of for once and not being the one with more? She hadnt been with a man that had more security than she had.

Edited by Bailey.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

According to the "confirmation" Janet isn't getting a divorce as of yet, she's just publicly splitting from her husband. Shit is weird. Very weird. I just can't wait to see how this plays out. 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I have a hard time believing that after suffering physical and emotional abuse from James, foolishness and betrayal from Rene and whatever the hell Mauldin did to cause their relationship to end that, Janet would really deal with a husband that was controlling. All before Janet was young and broken and not used to dating but when she got with Wissam she was grown AF and healed from all the hurt in her past. It just doesn't make sense to me that after going through all of that growth, she would find her self back in the same type of unhealthy relationship. So, if that was the case; if he was "controlling," then maybe he did just become controlling throughout her pregnancy and into the beginning of little E's life. Otherwise, I don't believe it. At all.

 

Granted, we are creatures of habit. And we seek what we're used to because its comfortable, but no. She's too self aware for that shit. I just don't see it. 

that's actually what makes it believable. She was in a vulnerable place when they started dating and she has always had issues with image and self confidence regardless of the growth. That's why I always felt the covering up thing was dangerous. A woman with body image issues and you cover her and not exalt her.  Women in mentally and physically abusive relationships are no different than addicts. They have a dependency and they always go back. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Ok. we dont know whats going on or what went down. And its really none of our business either (lutfa). BUT I will say this... I understand where she was coming from with wanting a stable and private life etc. But to me she didn't seem like herself in this relationship. yea yea part of her is submissive etc but she is also a very strong, outspoken and bubbly person (at least in public). and to me it seemed odd that all of a sudden she was covering herself from head to toe and not speaking a word. i was happy that she was happy but i always hoped she had found happiness with someone more liberal and relaxed, and with someone she didnt have to change herself for...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Ok. we dont know whats going on or what went down. And its really none of our business either (lutfa). BUT I will say this... I understand where she was coming from with wanting a stable and private life etc. But to me she didn't seem like herself in this relationship. yea yea part of her is submissive etc but she is also a very strong, outspoken and bubbly person (at least in public). and to me it seemed odd that all of a sudden she was covering herself from head to toe and not speaking a word. i was happy that she was happy but i always hoped she had found happiness with someone more liberal and relaxed, and with someone she didnt have to change herself for...

Her being more covered didn't really bother me. I just hated those pants. I know a lot of fans were not happy about her not giving any interviews.  Which again didn't really bother me given how invasive the media can be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Janet is a very strong woman no one can control her , she is doing as she want, lots of couple divorce after a baby... that's life... 

 

maybe its all fake maybe its true but what is sure is that she have not been controlled by a man... she too strong for that.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sooooooo while I'm still waiting to see if anything from Janet surfaces - does this mean Lessons Learned could have been about Janet?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The point is... When Daily Mail was the only website talking about it, we had all reasons to call it a bullshit.
01. They gave too much explicit details that might not (not impossible, tho) be true.
02. That's the kind of tabloid that give the news first and ask later.

But a few hours after, when major outlets like YAHOO, The Huffington Post and People Magazine starting telling we started paying attention.
I saw a lot of fans bitching about "wait for her lips..." "all lies..." 

BITCH, People Magazine had exclusive news to share about the pregnancy, ABC News is not The Wendy Williams Show... They have a reputation, an editor and journalists behind it. They checked the info with her reps before sharing it. 

Also, they wouldn't give away Janet's conection by sharing a rumor/lie. It's hard to make the woman talk, and if the websites she gives official reports started spreading rumors it oculd damage their relation!

This time the shitty tabloids were right and broke the news, then the serious outlets confirmed before started sharing too.

People must understand not every magazine or website is based on lies... Some of them acctually check information before coming out to the public!

And fans must also undersand Janet is a human being, just like us.
Relationships SUCKS sometimes... We don't know the reason and it's non of our business, but shit happens.

Maybe they weren't happy for awhile then she got pregnant... Or something happened during pregnancy. Anyway... It's not our business to judge.

I just can't wait for the true Janet to be back with a Velvet Rope/All For You vibe new record!

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I find it sad that many of the fans are saying "great - now Janet can get back to walking around half naked and grinding men on stage" as if that's all she amounts to.

The speculation is frustrating but somewhat undesrandable. I hope they are splitting so she can tend to her mother. Nothing else is really making sense... I'm truly baffled and still hoping for more clarification other than shit like that negative Daily Mail

 

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I find it sad that many of the fans are saying "great - now Janet can get back to walking around half naked and grinding men on stage" as if that's all she amounts to.

The speculation is frustrating but somewhat undesrandable. I hope they are splitting so she can tend to her mother. Nothing else is really making sense... I'm truly baffled and still hoping for more clarification other than shit like that negative Daily Mail

 

I think ABC News said there's some sort of official statement coming.
Let's wait.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Whatever it is, I sense there is more to it. I really hope it is not about being controlling, a fall out over the baby, or them not seeing eye to eye. I just feel like it's too much to be in the headlines for scandal when she so purposely & greatly avoids the headlines at all. I genuinely hope something official is coming out. I want her to have a successful relationship & not have repeated situations that seem to end in controversy or end at all. 

Her being a mother now, I deeply want her to have a GREAT relationship raising a child. I remember Jill Scott split very shortly after her son was born but they have a great relationship. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Whatever it is, I sense there is more to it. I really hope it is not about being controlling, a fall out over the baby, or them not seeing eye to eye. I just feel like it's too much to be in the headlines for scandal when she so purposely & greatly avoids the headlines at all. I genuinely hope something official is coming out. I want her to have a successful relationship & not have repeated situations that seem to end in controversy or end at all. 

Her being a mother now, I deeply want her to have a GREAT relationship raising a child. I remember Jill Scott split very shortly after her son was born but they have a great relationship. 

And isn't the father of Jill's son Lil' John Janet's drummer? Whatever it was to make them split so shortly after Janet give birth it must have been huge and most likely ongoing. Here I was thinking everything was in order and great for Janet...and the whole time she was probably miserable. I hope she is okay and baby Eissa. I just saw new pics of Wissam over on E! 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think Wissam probably was very controlling

you think that bc you were told to think that by the Great Depressed and the media

 🐑 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

you think that bc you were told to think that by the Great Depressed and the media

 🐑 

no he probably thinks that because Janet moved all her shit out of his house and got her own place. That means I can't even stand to live in the same home as you. A lot of separated people still live in the same house. She moved. That says a lot

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If someone from Wissam's camp spilled the beans I don't think they would have painted him as the uncaring controlling husband. 

the original story in the daily mail was very neutral, it was the story from page six written by stacy brown that added the controlling stuff and the stuff about katherine. the original story just said they decided it wasnt working, the baby would live with his mother in london and they will co-parent.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I can accept that they are not together,  but I'm definitely not here for this scammer/hustler talk. Is there any agreement in regards to their marriage out there?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

the original story in the daily mail was very neutral, it was the story from page six written by stacy brown that added the controlling stuff and the stuff about katherine. the original story just said they decided it wasnt working, the baby would live with his mother in london and they will co-parent.

That makes sense then. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

they have obviously been living apart for awhile considering the baby visited daddy at his house and janet is house hunting for her and her son. this didnt just happen over the weekend, it just got out to the press. now that i think about it gil never mentioned wissam during his live chats when he would talk about jan and eissa, also when those pics came out of janet shopping 3 weeks after giving birth one of those blogs said she was a single mother, of course nobody paid any attention to them. we actually dont know how long they have been seperated, it could have been before she gave birth.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

they have obviously been living apart for awhile considering the baby visited daddy at his house and janet is house hunting for her and her son. this didnt just happen over the weekend, it just got out to the press. now that i think about it gil never mentioned wissam during his live chats when he would talk about jan and eissa, also when those pics came out of janet shopping 3 weeks after giving birth one of those blogs said she was a single mother, of course nobody paid any attention to them. we actually dont know how long they have been seperated, it could have been before she gave birth.

Wendy said that they split 3 months before the baby was born....which I don't believe. I wonder if they were already living apart before Katherine and the others came to visit. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Wendy said that they split 3 months before the baby was born....which I don't believe. I wonder if they were already living apart before Katherine and the others came to visit. 

Was done after the "Wendy said" part here.  

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

I can accept that they are not together,  but I'm definitely not here for this scammer/hustler talk. Is there any agreement in regards to their marriage out there?

they are basing this golddigger bs off that fake prenup story from back when they announced they were married. nobody knows whats in their prenup or if they even have one. wissam is a businessman, he would be a jackass to agree to pay 500 million regardless how long married.

they are also counting 5years and 2 months because she announced the marriage in february 2013, so they are assuming they got married in february 2012 smh.  

Edited by dlite
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sooooooo while I'm still waiting to see if anything from Janet surfaces - does this mean Lessons Learned could have been about Janet?

obviously it was about Janet.  I thought that was a given? Id presumed it was about her from the start 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0