• Announcements

    • Planet Janet Rules   07/07/2015

      General Rules for Planet Janet Welcome to Planet Janet! The main objective of this board is to express your love for Janet, your opinions, and to interact with an important segment of the Janet fandom.  To enjoy your experience here, below are general rules and guidelines to make your experience here be successful: The N Word Please be aware that the N word is going to be filtered on this forum. Most importantly, this word is not acceptable on this forum in any form; therefore, if it is used again by ANY member on here, it will result in an immediate and permanent ban. Consider this the first, only, and last warning regarding this. Music Download | Copyright Infringement Illegal download links to music from any artist are not permissible to be posted on this forum at any time. If you have posted an illegal download link, you must take it down immediately. Failure to remove the links, and/or subsequent, repeated offenses will result in disciplinary action up to and including a permanent ban from the forum. Fan Threads of Other Artists Generally, we like to keep threads and/or topics about other artists within an Official Artist Thread.  This helps to eliminate clutter and redundancy throughout the forum and allow a one-stop shop to view comments on that particular artist not pertaining to Janet.  If there is HUGE news related to an artist and generates a lot of discussion, it is okay to have a standalone thread on that topic outside of the Official Thread. A good debate is OKAY in the Official Threads of other artists.  Official Threads are not complete sanctuaries of devotion of that particular artist; however, there is a need to be civil with other members.  Please refrain from personal attacks and arguments that devolve into personal attacks. Additionally, do NOT use Janet as means to defend an artist.  This forum is made in her honor, and putting her down to boast your particular artist is prohibited. Exercise good judgment and common sense.  If not, then the moderating team will exercise disciplinary action depending on the egregiousness of the action.  Please utilize this announcement as a first warning. Personal Attacks

      Each member has a warning percentage - most of them are at zero right now but a few have been warned before. Each warning is worth 10%, and once it gets to 100% the member is automatically banned from the forum. 

      Each time a member gets into an argument with another member that includes personal attacks, if it is reported or viewed by a member of the moderating team, each participant in the personal attack will get an increase in their warning percentage.  They will be notified via PM, and, prior to posting again, will receive a receipt acknowledging that warning before they can post again. The Moderating Team will never divulge a member's warn percentages on the forum or to other members.

      What this means is you are now responsible for your own future on this forum. The Moderating Team will not keep asking you to stop and being ignored. Learn to let things go and learn to moderate yourself before posting; if you end up banned it will be your own fault. Personal attacks and include attacks on one’s race, age, religious creed, color, gender, national origin, physical, mental or visual disability, medical condition, ancestry, marital and military status, pregnancy or sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and general physical appearance/looks. Depending on the nature of the personal attack there will be corrective action up and including permanent banning. If you have any inquiries about your warning percentage, feel free to PM a mod for an answer. If you need any clarification on the rules, feel free to reach out to The Moderating Team.
       
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

[PAPARAZZI] Wissam + Eissa in London

35 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

But there were pictures of Wissam without Eissa the whole week the news broke. It's no coincidence they both started doing the same thing. Janet is the first person to have shown you Eissa. Then Wissam followed suit...there is no difference they were both doing the same thing, it's just easier for fans to kinda shake their head at Wissam while overlooking Janet. 

She teased you with stroller pics because she knew later that week she was going to show you a picture of him. Then...drop tour info. 

Maybe Janet wanted to control how her son's image would get out for the world to see. It does seem strange that ultra private Wissam whom we barely see is doing these photo ops for the press. He is supposed to be more private than Janet, yet we are seeing him out and about with the baby more than Janet is....and she's the celebrity. What is he trying to prove? I hope for Eissa's sake that this doesn't get ugly. He's got two powerful parents...I'm praying that they think of him first and keep this as friendly as possible...they've got the next 18 years to get this right. It's best they get a handle on it now.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

the difference is she dont have her infant out on display for the paps. she posted a picture of her baby on her own social media like every other mother does, wissam could have posted a pic on his site but he chooses to use the tabloids. when was you seeing pics of wissam before the split?  he even had the paps at his house while toys and shit was being carried in. this man claims to be more private than janet, he protected his own privacy and there is no way the tabloids would know when and where he will have the baby unless they are being told. for some reason he thinks that having these staged pictures somehow makes him look like a good father but its not, he is being called out for exploiting that baby.

Janet did the exact same thing, the baby was just in a stroller. Idc if she posted the picture in her house she did it to get the world's attention on what she's been doing to then drop tour dates within days of it. Let's stop creating exclusive barriers around them. If you think for one minute Janet is against this BUT called the paps for her lead up to their big reveal herself you're being naive. 

If you believe he called the paps to show he had toys why don't you believe Janet called the paps to discuss their separation & show moving trucks? I'm not saying he didn't call them I'm just saying he's no different from Janet using the leverage of motherhood & child to promote her own gains as well.

Side note: has divorce papers been filed...as far as public document? 

 

I'm seeing the resemblance pretty strong, save for the skin color.... 

 

 

I don't see it yet. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

the pap pics were all about "see look Im the better parent" and it went back and forth then stopped.....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

the pap pics were all about "see look Im the better parent" and it went back and forth then stopped.....

Where's the factual source that proves that's what it was about? If we're blindly throwing theories out someone can say the paps pix were about Janet about to come back into the limelight so to create some buzz THEY Wissam & Janet waited before her launch to start being "public" parents. It keeps a conversation going....

At this point NONE of us know the details of their relationship or parenting. Janet is no different from Wissam in my opinion they both used a moment in the public eye to forward SOME type of agenda...what that agenda is, is unknown. I think fans love to gawk & point fingers at one person as if Janet cannot be equally human. She played the game too. 

Maybe Janet wanted to control how her son's image would get out for the world to see. 

She could have done that with out the "roll out" no pun intended. She could have given an exclusive to a press company, she could have given a selfie with no press of her in the park, she could have written a letter & put pictures of her & Eissa like she did when she was making Unbreakable - she chose the same means as Wissam. Let's not be unfair. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Where's the factual source that proves that's what it was about? If we're blindly throwing theories out someone can say the paps pix were about Janet about to come back into the limelight so to create some buzz THEY Wissam & Janet waited before her launch to start being "public" parents. It keeps a conversation going....

At this point NONE of us know the details of their relationship or parenting. Janet is no different from Wissam in my opinion they both used a moment in the public eye to forward SOME type of agenda...what that agenda is, is unknown. I think fans love to gawk & point fingers at one person as if Janet cannot be equally human. She played the game too. 

She could have done that with out the "roll out" no pun intended. She could have given an exclusive to a press company, she could have given a selfie with no press of her in the park, she could have written a letter & put pictures of her & Eissa like she did when she was making Unbreakable - she chose the same means as Wissam. Let's not be unfair. 

what are you even talking about? janet dont need to use the baby for no roll out, she is a celebrity with fans who wanted to see her baby.  we saw a few pics of pregnant janet out and about, we saw a pic of janet pushing the baby in a stroller without even actually seeing the baby, then she posted his pic on her social media for her fans. the pics of her with the baby at the park was before they announced the split, i dont see how you are comparing those pics to wissam having the baby on display for the paps. if janet wanted to use the baby for some kinda buzz as you say she would of had him on the video with her when she announced the tour, she posted one picture and thats it. wissam sits on a bench with the baby looking totally detached while the daily mail snaps pictures. why would janet need a press company to show her fans her baby? she posted a pic on social media ,that was enough. wissam is not use to dealing with the press, he's behaving  like other attention whoring parants.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

what are you even talking about? janet dont need to use the baby for no roll out, she is a celebrity with fans who wanted to see her baby.  we saw a few pics of pregnant janet out and about, we saw a pic of janet pushing the baby in a stroller without even actually seeing the baby, then she posted his pic on her social media for her fans. the pics of her with the baby at the park was before they announced the split, i dont see how you are comparing those pics to wissam having the baby on display for the paps. if janet wanted to use the baby for some kinda buzz as you say she would of had him on the video with her when she announced the tour, she posted one picture and thats it. wissam sits on a bench with the baby looking totally detached while the daily mail snaps pictures. why would janet need a press company to show her fans her baby? she posted a pic on social media ,that was enough. wissam is not use to dealing with the press, he's behaving  like other attention whoring parants.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4407012/amp/Janet-Jackson-emerges-baby-boy-Eissa-time.html

Here's the facts. She did NOT go to the park before the split was announced she went after. Check the link above. She also LITERALLY did a roll out plan from announcing the split, being seen in public with the child pointing at trees in a park for about 30-45 minutes, to posting a picture on social media, to announcing the tour.  It was a play by play. I even said as it was happening that it was coming. She waited until it was nearly time to emerge to allow the buzz to put her name at the top of people's search. And btw, fans need to learn this - her CORE FANS (ppl in forums and groups) DO NOT SELL OUT ARENAS! It is her casual fans who love her nostalgically & who want to go see her for her brand that sells out arenas. 

Those surface people also buy sensationalism. They like to discuss pop culture & don't really give a shit about details. They buy into headlines and drama. Janet did the same thing as Wissam & I am willing to bet money that Janet knew & knows Wissam is going to take those pictures...yet BEFORE any court proceedings that COULD HAVE given him legal rights to visitation she allowed him to take the baby out not ONCE but TWICE...before they ever hit court. Like I said, most fans are very surface & act as if Wissam is acting alone & Janet has no knowledge or influence in the way this is playing out. It's literally all the same. 

Lastly fans are so damn corny trying to say Eissa looks detached when cameras are literally catching milliseconds of a moment. How many pictures have you taken that you looked less than spectacular in? How many times do people retake SELFIES?! The shit is worse than the paparazzi the way people feed into fractions of drama. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

This has got to be the most mundane debate

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

This has got to be the most mundane debate

well until something better comes along....

hopefully it won't be too much longer for our next dose of Mama J

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

well until something better comes along....

hopefully it won't be too much longer for our next dose of Mama J

I thought I was bad. Well I don’t speak from Uncertainties 

Heard she’s on a plane (American Airlines)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0