Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Angela

      Planet Janet Rules   07/07/2015

      General Rules for Planet Janet Welcome to Planet Janet! The main objective of this board is to express your love for Janet, your opinions, and to interact with an important segment of the Janet fandom.  To enjoy your experience here, below are general rules and guidelines to make your experience here be successful: The N Word Please be aware that the N word is going to be filtered on this forum. Most importantly, this word is not acceptable on this forum in any form; therefore, if it is used again by ANY member on here, it will result in an immediate and permanent ban. Consider this the first, only, and last warning regarding this. Music Download | Copyright Infringement Illegal download links to music from any artist are not permissible to be posted on this forum at any time. If you have posted an illegal download link, you must take it down immediately. Failure to remove the links, and/or subsequent, repeated offenses will result in disciplinary action up to and including a permanent ban from the forum. Fan Threads of Other Artists Generally, we like to keep threads and/or topics about other artists within an Official Artist Thread.  This helps to eliminate clutter and redundancy throughout the forum and allow a one-stop shop to view comments on that particular artist not pertaining to Janet.  If there is HUGE news related to an artist and generates a lot of discussion, it is okay to have a standalone thread on that topic outside of the Official Thread. A good debate is OKAY in the Official Threads of other artists.  Official Threads are not complete sanctuaries of devotion of that particular artist; however, there is a need to be civil with other members.  Please refrain from personal attacks and arguments that devolve into personal attacks. Additionally, do NOT use Janet as means to defend an artist.  This forum is made in her honor, and putting her down to boast your particular artist is prohibited. Exercise good judgment and common sense.  If not, then the moderating team will exercise disciplinary action depending on the egregiousness of the action.  Please utilize this announcement as a first warning. Personal Attacks

      Each member has a warning percentage - most of them are at zero right now but a few have been warned before. Each warning is worth 10%, and once it gets to 100% the member is automatically banned from the forum. 

      Each time a member gets into an argument with another member that includes personal attacks, if it is reported or viewed by a member of the moderating team, each participant in the personal attack will get an increase in their warning percentage.  They will be notified via PM, and, prior to posting again, will receive a receipt acknowledging that warning before they can post again. The Moderating Team will never divulge a member's warn percentages on the forum or to other members.

      What this means is you are now responsible for your own future on this forum. The Moderating Team will not keep asking you to stop and being ignored. Learn to let things go and learn to moderate yourself before posting; if you end up banned it will be your own fault. Personal attacks and include attacks on one’s race, age, religious creed, color, gender, national origin, physical, mental or visual disability, medical condition, ancestry, marital and military status, pregnancy or sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and general physical appearance/looks. Depending on the nature of the personal attack there will be corrective action up and including permanent banning. If you have any inquiries about your warning percentage, feel free to PM a mod for an answer. If you need any clarification on the rules, feel free to reach out to The Moderating Team.


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/10/2017 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    Like I said somewhere else... I'm sad for her, but I hope it brings the "true janet" back. And by true Janet I mean: expontaneous, sharp tongue, aware of her accomplishments and skills, funny... I always liked Wissam and from the start we all could see how happy she looked. But we can also agree she seems to have taken a "step back" on a few areas like her shyness and stuff. Grab any interview from the Number Ones Era and the few rare insights we had during Unbreakable. She stands diffrent, she looks diffrent and being a "married woman" has nothing to do with that. What I'm saying, MY OPINION NOT THE TRUTH, is maybe she held back some stuff even traces of her own personality to make the relationship work. We all do that, I already did that! Not saying Unbreakable is not a "true janet" album, cause it is! Production, lyrics... But her attitude was not the same. During the Unbreakabe Era Janet looked much more like the shy and young Contro/RN Janet than the bold woman she became.
  2. 3 points
    I find it sad that many of the fans are saying "great - now Janet can get back to walking around half naked and grinding men on stage" as if that's all she amounts to. The speculation is frustrating but somewhat undesrandable. I hope they are splitting so she can tend to her mother. Nothing else is really making sense... I'm truly baffled and still hoping for more clarification other than shit like that negative Daily Mail
  3. 2 points
    It's good to see her. I'm now believing this was supposed to happen like this. ET got pics of Wissam yesterday and we haven't seen him for months. Now here's Janet and we haven't seen her since January. We are seeing them because they want to be seen.
  4. 2 points
    She looks well from that pic...but this almost feels orchestrated. I wish them well too.
  5. 2 points
  6. 2 points
    Just wanted to share that we're not going to "get sexy Janet back". While she doesn't have to clothe herself from head to toe, she is fine doing age appropriate music and wardrobe. I think it's very selfish and demeaning to expect her to do what she's already done. If you want sexy Janet, go watch the past tours. She's still radiant and beautiful, no matter what.
  7. 2 points
    The point is... When Daily Mail was the only website talking about it, we had all reasons to call it a bullshit. 01. They gave too much explicit details that might not (not impossible, tho) be true. 02. That's the kind of tabloid that give the news first and ask later. But a few hours after, when major outlets like YAHOO, The Huffington Post and People Magazine starting telling we started paying attention. I saw a lot of fans bitching about "wait for her lips..." "all lies..." BITCH, People Magazine had exclusive news to share about the pregnancy, ABC News is not The Wendy Williams Show... They have a reputation, an editor and journalists behind it. They checked the info with her reps before sharing it. Also, they wouldn't give away Janet's conection by sharing a rumor/lie. It's hard to make the woman talk, and if the websites she gives official reports started spreading rumors it oculd damage their relation! This time the shitty tabloids were right and broke the news, then the serious outlets confirmed before started sharing too. People must understand not every magazine or website is based on lies... Some of them acctually check information before coming out to the public! And fans must also undersand Janet is a human being, just like us. Relationships SUCKS sometimes... We don't know the reason and it's non of our business, but shit happens. Maybe they weren't happy for awhile then she got pregnant... Or something happened during pregnancy. Anyway... It's not our business to judge. I just can't wait for the true Janet to be back with a Velvet Rope/All For You vibe new record!
  8. 2 points
    that's actually what makes it believable. She was in a vulnerable place when they started dating and she has always had issues with image and self confidence regardless of the growth. That's why I always felt the covering up thing was dangerous. A woman with body image issues and you cover her and not exalt her. Women in mentally and physically abusive relationships are no different than addicts. They have a dependency and they always go back.
  9. 2 points
    Firstly, i hope janet is ok and i hope that she isn't hurting emotionally and just focusing on her wonderful new baby. But, i have to say, Im not entirely surprised. Something just felt...a bit off with him. The fact she cancelled her shows in Europe where she has lots of fans yet still performed for a wealthy crowd in dubai which.. Let's be real. .probably isn't Janet's fanbase.. Stinks of him.. It will be very interesting to see if the arabic additions to tweets etc are dropped after this. I wish her the best, but something tells me this separation may indeed lift some behavioural expectations placed on her by that man.
  10. 2 points
    I have said all along that he was controlling and at some point she would grow tired of being Susie homemaker. When she wasn't taking photos with people or talking I blamed him and his influence on her. The whole Diamond collection thing is all him. She doesn't even wear earrings or jewelry like that and all of a sudden she's pushing these overpriced diamonds picked by Africans that look like her. maybe she wanted to get out ahead of whatever storm may be coming from his end. He is not being painted in the best way so maybe she wanted to fire her shots before he did.
  11. 2 points
    She tried Janet so I tried her
  12. 1 point
    Actually, I think quite the opposite. I believe they might be completely in agreement & "working" this situation in the public together for whatever reason. This doesn't feel like a fight to me. Story drops, they're both seen on the same day. Last we saw or knew they were hand in hand. It just feels like there's something behind this.
  13. 1 point
    it is kinda obvious now, you actually see Janet out in public within a day of this story? Its not a coincidence and it is orchestrated ....I wonder just how mad they are?
  14. 1 point
    This wasn't orchestrated... it was VERY orchestrated. But good for them both, to have (hopefully) went through some of the toughest things in private, and now getting it out so that the public won't be able to hound them about it. With new pics come new questions... like WHO IS BOBBY TAYLOR?!?! LOL
  15. 1 point
    where the Wissam pics?
  16. 1 point
    it does feel like it's constructed I don't know why but if she doesn't want to be seen you don't see her
  17. 1 point
    Many have...not necessarily on here, but they have.
  18. 1 point
    Whatever happened, I'm just praying for Janet, Eissa, Wissam and the whole family. None of this can be easy for them. And all this Twitter BS about a Pre Nup is not based on facts. Shameful how quick people are to label Janet as a "golddigger" and "hustler" when they have no clue about her private affairs. What they don't understand?? Society has always been quick to turn against a successful black female when things go wrong. A New Agenda is OVER Due!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Y-2-Z5ygsg
  19. 1 point
    obviously it was about Janet. I thought that was a given? Id presumed it was about her from the start
  20. 1 point
    Was done after the "Wendy said" part here.
  21. 1 point
    I can accept that they are not together, but I'm definitely not here for this scammer/hustler talk. Is there any agreement in regards to their marriage out there?
  22. 1 point
    the original story in the daily mail was very neutral, it was the story from page six written by stacy brown that added the controlling stuff and the stuff about katherine. the original story just said they decided it wasnt working, the baby would live with his mother in london and they will co-parent.
  23. 1 point
    you think that bc you were told to think that by the Great Depressed and the media ?
  24. 1 point
    Janet is a very strong woman no one can control her , she is doing as she want, lots of couple divorce after a baby... that's life... maybe its all fake maybe its true but what is sure is that she have not been controlled by a man... she too strong for that.
  25. 1 point
  26. 1 point
    According to the "confirmation" Janet isn't getting a divorce as of yet, she's just publicly splitting from her husband. Shit is weird. Very weird. I just can't wait to see how this plays out.
  27. 1 point
    I have a hard time believing that after suffering physical and emotional abuse from James, foolishness and betrayal from Rene and whatever the hell Mauldin did to cause their relationship to end that, Janet would really deal with a husband that was controlling. All before Janet was young and broken and not used to dating but when she got with Wissam she was grown AF and healed from all the hurt in her past. It just doesn't make sense to me that after going through all of that growth, she would find her self back in the same type of unhealthy relationship. So, if that was the case; if he was "controlling," then maybe he did just become controlling throughout her pregnancy and into the beginning of little E's life. Otherwise, I don't believe it. At all. Granted, we are creatures of habit. And we seek what we're used to because its comfortable, but no. She's too self aware for that shit. I just don't see it.
  28. 1 point
    I was referring to the family as a whole the Jacksons do a lot in private they marry in private not just Janet
  29. 1 point
    Hmmm why the leak and why now? No clue but there's more to it
  30. 1 point
    That's what it's sounding like. That's what I was referring too when I told @ DasSad that she had been calling it. She was always saying that. Not to say Janet is prefect because she did choose to marry him so she has to take some of the blame. There were signs...some of us just chose to over look them. I certainly did.
  31. 1 point
    Oh God. Many of her family members weren't involved in her marriage with Rene everyone. A lot of her family wasn't around for many highlight moments. Sense when have they all EVER rushed to the hospital? Do you know if Janet was at the hospital when her neices & nephews were born? I'm just saying - Janet is a mastermind of staying out of the headlines & press when she doesn't want to be. A leak of this magnitude feels like there's more to the story than just being candid about a separation.
  32. 1 point
  33. 1 point
    look at all those fuckin' retweets. People make me sick and of course Wendy dumb ass will probably be reporting on that figure tomorrow smh
  34. 1 point
    Janet loves her fans like many celebs do but fans also have to understand they are a part of the business structure. They aren't TRUE obligations, they are the market to which artist sell their products. I know artist use fan love like, it's their foundation but at the end of the day it's all business. She gets tired of interacting with people in general. She's human. So when she's tired of the industry & tired of touring - she's also drained having to exchange & devote energy with countless people. It's not personal it's just human.
  35. 1 point
  36. 1 point
    I thought he was cute, certainly an upgrade from JD
  37. 1 point
  38. 0 points
    I sure as hell didn't, I said them harem pants suck
  39. 0 points
    well there were somethings I found odd, Janet's family wasn't with her when she gave birth, they saw the baby after. I mean the baby of the Jacksons has a child and her own mother is NOT there?
  40. -1 points
    Woo y'all can come out now. No longer do you have to pretend his big-nosed ass was cute beyond a quick once-and-done glance. No longer do you have to pretend to be happy for her while she cancels yet another tour. No longer do you have to pretend like you give a fuck about anything but another album.
  41. -1 points
  42. -1 points
  43. -1 points
    No I think that from what we all have seen over the years of them being together, he didnt move to Malibu but Janet sure moved to Dubai