No... i aint attempting to prove everything
u should have ur receipts
anywaz,
the teacher is the victim
that piece of shit knows what he is doing
and he is assaulting her
in some jurisdictions, u dont need to be physically hit to be assaulted
but u havent done criminal law?
im guessing uve done some pre-law school stuff
but ur not actually in law school, and love to act as tho ur authoritative
u said that u can never put ur hands on someone
but then u said 9/10 it wont be in ur favor
so ur wrong
im sure u were gettn @ ur lil self defence notion, but u didnt say that
and this whole 9/10 rubbish is rubbish
whered u get those facts from?
i trust u looked at the legislation and the case law when writing that?
what about harassment?
what about provocation?
and why then did the police say she was "likely acting in self defence?"