Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Days Won


Everything posted by jarrylf

  1. Nope, cause it's not like it's "November 2022"....like when cosmetic mogal Rihanna will probably consider another album
  2. Isn't that in itself delusional though? It's saying "I'm wrong, and you're right, but I don't like this aspect of you so it doesn't matter".... Like last I checked, a fact is a fact until it's proven fiction or just a theory, but if it's a proven fact no matter who presents it, it's still a fact.
  3. I would be SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO upset if a Gaga pregnancy threatened this massive momentum she has to slay right now But she's not so keeping the fuckin momentum going!!!! Keep the NuvaRing in or keep the fellas rappin it up pls! I feel for her tho, beyond the "Gaga-ness", Stephanie do want that family....but she can wait....Keep the standards high girl!
  4. If she wants to make it a big deal, during (in fact if during she opens with Scream....BIGGEST statement, and I'd cream my corn for that). If she doesn't want to be big news she'll likely keep it casual and to what she's always said over the years or along the tone.
  5. Welp, I'm glad your opinion is in the minority (even by those who imagine he's guilty too), so bump that whole 1st paragraph However what you will not do is simply call the Queen "his sister" like she's a La Toya, Rebbie or Joh'Vonnie, or that her successes or failures depend on his. Off the bat no matter what she says UNLESS she comes out against him, the automatic assumption (like you assume that he's guilty) is/should be that she thinks he's innocent, sheeple with a problem with that have either already left her fanbase or are awaiting their refunds for their tickets. She is a Jackson, but she is Janet first, supporting her is supporting her, not any & every other Jackson no matter what you or anyone thinks of any of them. We call Janet Janet, we call the other 3 "his sister", otherwise it is assault and I will phone the authorities like I'm a white lady in a park looking at the colored folk have a barbecue
  6. The accuracy of it all. If someone puts some cocaine out will they both stop and try to fight for it
  7. Remember back when Rihanna use to make music, where does the time go
  8. But this wasn't a scripted "doc".......Nah they probably gotta hang on to the real stuff so they can sell it again. Really?Jordie, Gavin, Wade & James who else? or is this just what you imagine Not every molester is a pornographer, but most have porn of what they're attracted to "and barely legal Womens" isn't pre-teen boys. Allegedly, more people say that didn't happen than the 4 who did but change their stories (that's the thing too, he specifically goes after kids that exhibit memory issues or something now :lmao: And also that crime, like murder, like raping was easier to commit in the 70s, there wasn't child porn on the web Problem is you said "there's unreasonable doubt".....yet he's been on trial if there was unreasonable doubt he would've gotten at LEAST 1 of those charges, so that's your opinion. I'm also someone who watches this doc's as a hobby I can break down what went wrong & right in so many cases, and in this one everything went right, there was never any reasonable doubt on the books, every assumption you have and you have come to a jury had to look at and consider it all.....and he got off, the FBI had to look through...nothing. Reasonable doubt literally is about the assumptions you & others have exhibited.....and they ruled no if there was reasonable doubt he would've at LEAST got something. Wade & James both have nothing to contribute to this beyond the assumptions some already. YAS And yup, it's proudly ignorant honestly. ESPECIALLY when you have a ton of credible names of kids who were those kids and defending his actions and his character. #gather
  9. The gag is #'s 9&10........over Diana muthafuckin 50yr career tons of hits ROSS?!?!....that's rude, but if Janet weren't in the top 3 the list would be a disaster, but she is so a fuck up here & there is OK
  10. I think it was a chance to take a break from his career and family and life stresses to be connected with people who look at the world in a safe scope that most adults lose, that's not at all far fetched to me given his background. Yet again, your entire point is assumption & "imagine", that doesn't equate to rape or molestation. If we have to assume that he's molested every kid who's hand he held, you're insinuating it's not appropriate for any adult to ever do any of those things with a kid ever or they're molesting them. Truth is we already do that shit when teachers/coaches/mentors take kids on out of state trips with their parents consent, to assume what you are we have to assume they're all molesting too, and truth is more of the boys and girls who spent time with Michael defended & defend the time they spent with him & his character in their presence than the 4 that condemn or criticize it, if otherwise, you'd have a point. There was alot wrong with Michael Jackson, but not 1 of them points to for sure being a sexual predator, that's your assumption, that's your imagination, and that's your projection. Except judging off of the inconsistencies of the total 4 accusers, he "choose" kids who couldn't stick to a story? The fact that 3 of the 4 accusers were white and male is why guilty is so easily assumed, yet on the other hand, I think it's why the police worked so much harder to look for any hair out of place that can get a guilty verdict. Michael had so much porn but nothing traceable to pedophilia, someone so nieve (again if the drug use was the topic, that wasn't that hidden that was being reported for years, alot of what he was doing in what he thought was private was revealed and searched) yet something so massive and so major he's this "neat" on yet according to 3 of his accusers he's so bold to do such terrible things so openly and sloppily? I agree in general it's a tough spot and it's hard to prove, but it's why if you're accusing your word needs to be credible about your accusations, and since that doesn't exist with ANYONE who's accused him, to believe them or to believe he did anything, takes a level of disbelief I can't condone because there's nothing credible to prove it. That comparison shit is so weird to me, he had problems no other "normal" person could fathom, there was darkness in his life, look at his family, there's so much disfunction there on the parent level alone that those 9 kids were raised under, none of em really had a chance at "normal" they had to find it in their own ways, if or when they could, and I don't think they ever truly had an understanding. My personal theory in his relationship with kids based on what those kids say (the bulk majority) is that they think his time with them was a mix of 2 things, living vicariously through them, giving his inner child that kind of attention that he always wanted. Also the way he talks and always has talked about how badly he wanted to be a parent and help be a guide for kids. That's not based off of assumption, that's based on the number of people who've testified to that vs. the amount that allege it to be something else In general I've never been a "no kid should be around, alone with, close to, in bed with an adult they aren't related to" because I don't know every kid's & every families relationship to every 1 of those adults who aren't family, and that energy implies if the kid is related to the adult nothing dangerous or sexual will happen or is less likely to happen, when in reality and from what I've grown up seeing and hearing, some family members are more likely to take advantage of that trust & those positions than some strangers & family friends. So mass assumptions & judgments just aren't my thing, many things and relationships in life are Case Sensitive.
  11. Yea and I can't with people who think assumptions are as good as facts, evidence & investigations but here we are. Again, if the porn magazines were an issue it would've counted. "That doesn't look right" and, "I think" aren't enough to make someone guilty or innocent, they're an opinion based on appearance. Everything "guilty" he did in public, you have to assume to come up with a conclusion that it directly equals molestation.
  12. OK everyone who got the censored CD/DVD combo of All For you should recognize this club song for what the janet . era dancers auditioned to. I don't know if I'm the only 1 who always wanted to hear that song and always felt like the female vocal throughout the song was Janet. Well I recently found the song again, and it was my 1st time hearing the song in HQ & all the way through, and yes I think it's Janet. But beyond that, I have a love for this song because I always felt like The Best Things In Life Are Free was like the final goodbye to RN and a lil hint of janet. to come, vs. I feel like "The New Style" is the intro to the janet. era with a lil hint of RN & control too. But that's just how I feel about it, how do you guys like it? (if club songs with no verses/chorus aren't your thing you probably won't like this, literally Janets vocal I'm talking about is the same "Aaaaahhh ahh ahhh" played throught the song and over the beat, I dig it but others may not)
  13. Evidence that the FBI & The cops are trained to find (especially with excessive force), and find proof, find all that they did for R. Kelly. Fact about your counterpoint, sharing the truth with the world isn't easy, but being inconsistent in what you say is your truth with the world watching, it's damning, and it is people who take advantage of the guise of being a survivor a victim or someone who overcame and found the strength to come forward. Fact: It is easy to take advantage when you can lie but your lies not be challenged. That's not everyone, that wasn't the case for R. Kelly's victims, if Sparkle didn't come out about her niece on that tape with him, he was working on making her a star, he was keeping her pockets full, and she turned him and all his advances away for justice, some people have that moral compose that are bigger than others, some people can't be bought that way
  14. Basically, the message for believing he's a pedophile is "if I can assume it that means he did it" #Preach He really is Got me gagging at "see feminism", gather a bit Bu, gather a bit To be fair...it's literally all he has and all he can factually hate Michael for based on facts & evidence the rest all assumption #Hecoulda Exactly, which again according to police & witness reports, his raids and his monitoring were over-policed.......something that the police have a thing for doing when they expect someone to be guilty or in general they have of doing with someone black OOP BU GATHERED AGAIN!!! YUSSSSSSSS COME ON THRU! That's not allowed, don't you know Bailey that it's impossible to be given gifts and say "No thanks"? Everybody knows when you're given a gift you HAVE to accept it or else you'll be put to death. Just like everybody knows if you do drugs you're also a pedophile. And that facts and the truth are never as important as blind belief. But you certainly don't believe the facts In general, this whole quote here......your bias is showing dear, because of the 3 names you listed 2 of them have been inconsistent on this topic and this is not the topic to be inconsistent on, thus you're saying you'll believe anything they say....so rational..... Everybody notice that hasn't changed right?....all the deflections, why no answers..
  15. PREACH, that's the entire point, again it's lazy as hell to sum his defense as blind love when we're the ones looking at the full picture, not just 1 documentary, that by all accounts is just an interview, a documentary is investigative journalism, there was no investigation here, it was a story being told to camera's, a story they can't even stick to... All of that, that's what it boils down to, these facts are getting ignored because he doesn't want them to be right in this case. And the fact that there are so many contradictions to that stance only shows his lack of attention to it as a whole. R. Kelly uses to be a fave of mine for a moment of time, yet even when he was it was abundantly clear, he was a pedophile. There wasn't any "That doesn't look right", "that doesn't look normal", he married a 15-year-old, and there were tapes of him having sex with teenagers...that changes who the man is for me, but it doesn't change what his music means to me. There is no blind fandom for me, or for any artist or actor or comedian I like, but it takes more than words and accusations to change how I look at ANYONE because that's their human right. Michael's relationship with kids that people find disturbing is assumption & opinion. R. Kellys was/is disturbing based on evidence and accusors who's story remained air tight.
  16. Ah, so the number of views make it wrong, or just simply are you trying to ignore facts to stick to your narrative? So you're admitting you're going to continue to choose fiction over facts...cute. Child molesters and drug abusers are 2 different things but you're going to keep comparing them... Who was the child molester tho? R. Kelly? I mean Mike was proven to be an addict, but that's it...so I wonder what proven child abuser you're talking about. Yea except This situation is not what #Metoo was originally about, this is what it's become. The issue of what its become now is "believe all accusations" gives many people with suspect motives and intentions (like Wade & James) the easy opportunity & access to do exactly what you're claiming Michael did, take advantage of naive & easily persuadable people to have them on their side blindly. That is an insult to due process. My instinct is not to rush to judgment when it comes to anything until I see the facts laid out Vs. Your instinct is to condemn someone you don't know because someone else you don't has a story that you believe literally at all cost & face value, and the fact that the story keeps changing doesn't bother you say more to your blind faith than my fandom or my reliance on facts & credibility. Point exactly where I denied his drug use ever, I'm not the one dodging facts, that's your stance. I'm the one bringing them to the table, while you try to do any and everything but prove them wrong, worst, you're trying to deny and cover. That's pathetic & it's unreasonable, it's lazy and it's truly Trumplike. And instead of encouraging me to step back, I encourage you to step the fuck up and stop ignoring facts for blind belief. You don't know Wade Robson or James Safechuck, you just agree with what they say in 1 documentary about someone else you don't know, yet manage to have gone out of your way to display nothing less than an unrealistic & unreasonable hatred for no matter what topic. You don't know him or them anymore than I do but my attention to every available fact gives me more credibility on this specific topic with these specific people than you. Take your seat, put your head back in the sand of belief while I'm looking at all the facts, and don't come out until you have something concrete to dispute them with.
  17. RIGHT, what's chilling about that doc is how some subjects would snap him right out of that for a min, but with him being him he was all over the place. THIS is the doc to check out, they break everything down including that doc too.
  18. Murder & Molestation are better comparisons than comparing being a drug addict to being a molester....so lets not on comparisons So lying about your appearance and your own issues, is the same as lying as lying about being molested?....that's a 1st, but again these comparisons... Another issue with the comparisons you make about his drug use & plastic surgery, Im not saying "if you lie at all you can't be telling the truth about anything", I'm saying if you're getting caught in a lie about the allegations against someone you make, you're not credible, there's a difference there like facts & "belief" Right there, no long wait
  19. See I can respect that, mostly too because it's your opinion. I disagree, I know celibate people in their 40s not everyone's urges for everything are exactly the same. My thing is, when it comes to a subject like this or murder when telling "your truth" if you're lying about some things, you're liable to lie about everything and your credibility is shot....and these 2 lied about so much, so much they didn't have to, and that's too telling for me in my opinion Yet you didn't know she was raised as one......hmm He sexually abused children? WHEN? what facts do you have? Also the drugs didn't come into play until his scalp burns and they didn't become a problem until 94 years after leaving the religion, that's a cute try tho. Is the new "belief is that everyone who's done drugs molested kids? The excuse is more credible than your theories on what makes him a molester "Someone said it so it's true"
  20. Then you don't seem to know her well, she's been talking about this stuff her whole career, again research doll, it's all there. Didn't you just say he was 20 when he started dating Stephanie? And yes by all accounts he believed every single thing they said, the fact that he didn't celebrate Christmas until he was 38, has a stupid disclaimer in the Thriller video, and being at the height of his fame would go door to door to preach to people when the church told him to....yup
  21. ......you've never heard any of them (Janet) talk about this? That the kids were all raised JH and when they were 18 they were allowed to make their own choice about religions. By all accounts on the subject of Jehovah's Witnesses, Katherine, Rebbie, La Toya & Michael are the only ones who were strict with going to church and bible study and living ridiculously close to what they believe the word says in terms of dating, sex & relationships, Michael ONLY left the religion because they told him to publically denounce La Toya (who they kicked out) and never speak to her again......How is this news in anything Jackson related? Who said that? The ones who are strict usually don't because they're afraid of being banished from the religion & all in it. Anything else? Michael also didn't celebrate Christmas until 1993.
  22. But then that opens the door to incinuating that everyone that ever has had kids sleeping next to them molested those kids....that's not a good enough excuse to merit the accusation. If that wasn't enough for the FBI over 10yrs or the courts.... You didn't, I used those as examples (see below for the rest) Point remains, people do dirt and people live clean no matter what their relationship status is. So you find it strange that a by the book STRICT Jehovah's witness (which he was till 89) didn't have premarital sex......the same man who almost canned the entire Thriller album & video because he thought it might offend his religion, the same man who during his entire touring career up to 89 made a stop in every Kindom Hall in whatever city they were in to go to church? Yea anyone who finds it strange can chop that up to that strange over the top religion he was in that discouraged dating unless it was to be on the path to marriage. This is Jackson family 101 stuff here, but again it has nothing to do with anything in this discussion
  23. I don't get the "who would lie about", "who does this", "who does that", "who would do that". If you catch me saying anything on those lines it's rhetorical because personally, I don't put people coming up with stupid stuff for less than nothing in return past everyone, some people are those "who would", there are tons of true crime docs and real stories about those people. And in all that, when there's money involved, huge money, alot of people would do alot of lying and cheating and stealing and killing that many would go "who does that" in response to.
  24. Yet the documentary I posted shows that his raid was over police and they did extra work, the police did above and beyond to point to guilty....such an advantage he had Then there's nothing that proves he was and so much that proves he wasn't, including inconsistencies in the liars who say he was . Believing everyone who accuses everyone (they've known) of everything without fact checking is unjust and barbaric. Yup, Stephanie & La Toya confirm, bloop. But I don't get what dating has to do with anything, John Wayne Gacy was married while he was abducting, rapping, and murdering teens and burying them under the house he & his family lived in. If Michael was single and celibate & gay his whole life it wouldn't be a point or a minus to this conversation
  25. Both mom's admitted to being stage moms, that's something else in Wade's case that the doc purposely downplayed, back when he was telling the truth his mom bragged about how aggressive of a stage mom she was, she did this on trial and she did this in interviews, it wasn't JUST about Michael, Wade's mom was pushing him to do everything. Judging by how easy some of the lies they said out their mouth, I don't take selling out their mothers to be a big deal for them, maybe that hatred is genuine for both of them. Hell maybe Wades giving his mom a piece of the donations he's getting (where the minimum is $250) What's funny is Michael did that shit for so many people period there more than likely were many cases where he didn't know the person & for what reason, he took care of everybody in his life to the extreme, period, including people he didn't know but knew people he knew, where's the blind faith in that? And not believing the facts #BeliefOverEvidence Can you prove he molested anyone ever? Or is that just the blind belief speaking?
  • Create New...