jarrylf

It's all there, he wants this, he wants to be the star, he says it. He wants people to feel sorry for him to have them on his side and support his moves. Also I have a theory of why they had to include Wade's family drama in this, it's literally the only time Wade sounds legitimately sad and sincere, like I couldn't have said that without seeing this, the most moved I've been through the whole doc is he & his family talking about his father's suicide.......(a hunk of time that has NOTHING to do with Michael or their friendship...just the fathers issues)...

Thanks, and I'm really proud of the GP, I gave them alot less credit than I should've, like you legit can't say "it's only MJ fans who don't like this/don't agree with it" people are really pressing, and saying "I'm not even a MJ fan, but this don't seem right" like this isn't a clean sweep at all. And what I can't get with is Wade being "ashamed" of defending Michael as long as he did, but then his mouth literally says "he doesn't regret defending him" in the doc......................................................................that's the shit right there......that's the muthafuckin shit right the fuck there, WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?! THIS is who we should believe? THIS is who we shouldn't fact check?? I really was trying to take this seriously too....but um......I damn near squealed at that

I'm over halfway through this mocumentary.......this is what's "convincing" people?!? ..... Like the words they're saying are as graphic as everyone said (hell even a lil more) but the behavior when talking about it is like way off....vs.....actual documentaries and actual victims, like what in the hell...? Yea your mind is only swayed in this if you were always leaning on Guilty and never looked into evidence but just don't like the way things "looked" or If you have the mentality "everyone who accuses anyone of anything is telling the truth". But if facts & evidence & consistency is your thing, you should be questioning many things, and I'm glad to see so many are

"the right questions" She'd have a inch more credibility over this....if OWN wasn't streaming it too Getcho rattings up girl!

..................so basically what you're implying by not knowing that nearly every review trashed this being a "doc", yet accused others of not reading them? Again WHAT ARE DOING BEING SO BLATANTLY WRONG, why would you set yourself up like this?!?! Even the reviews that praise the "doc" take aim at that, again what are you doing? At times “Leaving Neverland” feels more like a deposition than a documentary, given we’re hearing from only one side, again and again. https://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/in-hbo-documentary-michael-jackson-is-possibly-a-molester-definitely-a-weirdo/ The larger issue with Leaving Neverland, though, is that for something that calls itself a “documentary,” it is woefully one-sided — and in some cases, conveniently selective about the information it chooses to include about its two subjects. https://ew.com/tv-reviews/2019/02/21/leaving-neverland-review/ Leaving Neverland is not a movie that allows for two sides to this story. https://slate.com/culture/2019/01/leaving-neverland-review-michael-jackson-documentary-sundance-abuse.html Not a particularly imaginative documentary, in that it sticks to a straightforward narrative, and, in its empathetic approach, doesn't bother trying to include views from "the other side."-Boston Globe But Leaving Neverland's greatest advantage — its focus on the two men's personal testimony — is also its biggest weakness, as no one outside their families is interviewed by the filmmakers to provide a wider context. Most of the rebuttals to accounts of abuse in the movie come from news clips of Jackson and his lawyers addressing different allegations from different accusers. However, there are other sources who could have corroborated the men's stories, including former employees of Jackson questioned during the pop star's 2005 molestation trial (Jackson was acquitted on all charges). It's a stark contrast to another recent, attention-getting documentary, Lifetime's Surviving R. Kelly, which surrounded first-person allegations of abuse against the R&B star with fresh interviews. They featured everyone from Kelly's high school music teacher to two of his brothers. That approach left little doubt that viewers had seen a wide-ranging narrative that built its case on the foundation of dozens of similar stories. For Leaving Neverland, the lack of outside voices seems a crucial weakness, especially given that both men sued Jackson's estate years after his 2009 death. Their lawsuits were dismissed after judges said they filed claims too late, but their lawyer plans to file an appeal. https://www.npr.org/2019/03/01/699208558/neverland-makes-a-powerful-but-one-sided-case-against-the-king-of-pop So sleeping in a bed equals sex no matter what......everyone who gets in a bed only gets in for sex, literally nothing else , there's more witnesses and people saying otherwise. AH so you have to be "relevant" to be telling the truth He's extremely relevant in this case as is everyone who was ever a kid in Michael Jackson's life, relevancy means nothing, witnesses and people that knew the man do.

And you either want to see evidence or you believe he's guilty so you believe any story that says he is no matter how fake or wrong it is.

I'm waiting until I have 4 hours of comedy to spare today, but you don't need to when that's literally EVERY positive & negative response AND the directors proud goal of the doc, to be 1 sided. And no, like many reviewers say, by definition, documentaries of this nature especially are supposed to present opposing sides so I think it's you who's confused dear It doesn't make what Corey's saying factual, but his word carries more weight than theirs and he's more credible than both of them on this subject. I mean does Dahlmer's neighbor have a history of destroying other cannibals in their life?

YES they do, they have to disturb people who were/are on the fence about Micahaels guilt or innocence. If it doesn't disturb people, it stands the chance of people looking at the facts and not taking their performances seriously (which I love people are actually calling out their performances too)

Oprah (the OWN network more so) needs this...they have The Real Housewives Of Alabama.........they have shows the trashiest networks passed on......#Telling And I find it weird she's giving this attention but she was good judy's with Weinstein and has been quiet on that, hasn't said ANYTHING about R.Kelly or that doc or those victims, nor has she talked to Corey Feldman about the years of abuse by powerful men, or anyone from the documentary about (not so) underground pedophilia rings in Hollywood called an Open Secret that wasn't at all 1 sided. Michael accusations will always get attention, Oprah knows that, we all know that, Oprah needs views & promotion for it. I got love for Oprah, but she plays dirty when she wants to, and to know her history is to know THAT.

I can't at people taking that tool of a director or this doc seriously after he's gone everywhere and harped on "I want this to be as 1 sided as possible".......that's how "the truth" works?!?!? Eh we have alternative facts, now we have #alternativetruths

That was 1 of the criticisms everyone was talking about (along with it being 1 sided as fuck), but no you're suppose to care so you can feel bad, and they can get more money....aww.

Neither is presenting only 1 side of a story

Except, Corey is someone who comes out HARD against child abusors and cover ups, thus much to your dismay this carries weight and more weight than a normal "he didn't do it to me" If he didn't make a career out of naming names of real pedo's you would maybe have a point

That's what they can hope, but much to their dismay, the reaction is still mixed AF And their acting/performances have been getting dragged by everyone

I LOVE Corey Feldman is hitting back on behalf of those who actually were in a position to have something happen with MJ many times but it didn't....whilst his pinned tweet is about him coming out about abuse in Hollywood.

Um...Game......if it wasn't worked on, the inconsistency of his stories & his accounts since he 1st changed his mind (damning enough there) wouldn't be an issue...period...like are you asking to prove he changed his story.....cause well.... that's literally what this is all about Yup the facts are being given with the smoke

Exactly which is why this one had to be worked on. The thing is the attention discredits him, "copying & pasting" facts to answer to fiction is a bad look for the fiction creator

Yup but the potential book deals, speaking engagements, and pitty jobs he would get paid for if they can get the right dumb people to ignore the facts and jump on their side. Then again their word of not getting paid isn't exactly coming from credible sources.

Nah I'm waiting till tomorrow, not giving this fiction 2 days And that's what I'm expecting honestly, he NEEDS this money, so he needs to take advantage of peoples stupidity & the current climate to capitalize. I'm loving how everyone's being dragged for their "too happy" tone, also the fact checkers are spreading the words good.

Glad to see alot of Dragging going on in the #leavingneverland Twitter feed, like facts are being spoken & stepped up for and it's a beautiful thing. Also threats of lawsuits for falsely accusing other "victims". I think this'll be the tone of it all through the week, some will bring up what was said, but others will bring up what's been proven & what hasn't been.

Im loving the Unbreakable Hair pt.2 in this pic

#TeamAfronet I want a entire era of variations of afros and braid/loc styles, I've honestly wanted that since Discipline, and I hope even if it's not this era it's coming.

I think she gets bored with black hair fast.

TODAY.........it's all about.......