Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted March 11, 2019 Author Share Posted March 11, 2019 7 hours ago, jarrylf said: Except judging off of the inconsistencies of the total 4 accusers, he "choose" kids who couldn't stick to a story? The fact that 3 of the 4 accusers were white and male is why guilty is so easily assumed, yet on the other hand, I think it's why the police worked so much harder to look for any hair out of place that can get a guilty verdict. Michael had so much porn but nothing traceable to pedophilia, someone so nieve (again if the drug use was the topic, that wasn't that hidden that was being reported for years, alot of what he was doing in what he thought was private was revealed and searched) yet something so massive and so major he's this "neat" on yet according to 3 of his accusers he's so bold to do such terrible things so openly and sloppily? I agree in general it's a tough spot and it's hard to prove, but it's why if you're accusing your word needs to be credible about your accusations, and since that doesn't exist with ANYONE who's accused him, to believe them or to believe he did anything, takes a level of disbelief I can't condone because there's nothing credible to prove it. As if there were just four He’s a child molester... not a child pornographer. There’s a difference and if you don’t understand the difference, that’s cool. He definitely didn’t do any molesting out in the open. All done behind his hotel rooms & his Amusement Park Again, It is nearly impossible to find evidence of child molestation. Again, what do you think a child molester would leave behind? I just watched Abducted In Plain Sight, another documentary about an adult male’s infatuation over a 8-15 girl in the 1970s... He was married, he manipulated & groomed the parents and snatched the girl thrice times. He obviously raped her but when the doctors checked, said he didn’t. He eventually brainwashed her and she didn’t official come forward with it until 2003... thirty years after losing contact I watch and read a lot of crime documentaries... court cases from current events (violent crimes.. not white collar). While there is no smoking gun (impossible) there is unreasonable doubt that he has molested children. Take his fame & name away and you Wackos would be singing a different tune (lol get it?) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.