Jump to content

‘Leaving Neverland’, Docu about MJ’s Victims, Coming to HBO in March


Rock & Roll Hall of Game

Recommended Posts

On 3/28/2019 at 12:48 PM, jarrylf said:

I want to note his emails indicate that he only started writing his book (that he denied trying to do) after he was denied jobs with MJ's company, and only used the threat of said books (that were so badly done later nobody would pick them up after trying to shop them around for a while, which has to be REALLY crappy cause it's so easy to get a book out on MJ) to attempt to blackmail the estate into paying him, but they don't want you to know that....too bad that was brought up in court.

Problem is too, he was looking for and citing every TABLOID article that even his family in his emails denied being true or credible....but he still cited them, very telling.

They're liars because they've been proven to have lied and fabricated/edited tons in their stories on this subject SINCE coming out, not even to do with their memory of their childhood, of their memory of what they said 2-4yrs ago, they're trash. 

He asked his mother in the email if the tabloid story really happened. She said no, yet he still included it 🙄 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear to G*D, I do not believe a word of it. SafeCHECK claims he "had sex" with MJ above the train station on a daily basis, and the "abuse" occurred from 1988-1992. UNFORTUNATELY for him, the train station wasn't built until end of 1993; it was completed by 1994 right before MJ married LMP.

PROOF:

 
 
SafeCHECK, ROBson and Dan GREED are three CROOKS capitalizing on the #MeToo movement, and by doing so, they're making it harder for genuine victims of sex abuse (incl. child sex abuse) to be believed, and they're giving #MeToo a terrible name.

More receipts those guys are lying through their teeth!

 

http://themichaeljacksonallegations.com


Leaving Neverland has already been thoroughly debunked; though purported to be a "reality" documentary series, it's fiction—scripted fiction, a perversion of reality. In the film, audio messages were shortened to give the impression MJ only wanted to see the kids, but he also wanted the parents around.

What stuns me the most is not even the sheer cruelty and deception of those three crooks but how utterly GULLIBLE and NAÏVE so many can be, willing to spend 4 hours on Leaving Neverland + 1 hour on After Neverland (the Oprah interview), but 0 hour, 0 minute on any rebuttal video, article or website. And this is why I find the Sundance Film Festival, HBO, Channel 4 and Oprah utterly irresponsible and sketchy. It's like a jury only getting to listen to the prosecution, their arguments, their witnesses, their evidence and not ever getting to listen to the defence, their arguments, their witnesses and their evidence. That's a total and complete travesty of justice!

Those celebrities who blindly believe Leaving Neverland and won't even bother do any research are even more foolish 'cause they might be next! I swear to G*D, anytime I read anything negative, salacious or damning about any of those stars that believe MJ is guilty, I shall believe it 100%.


Leaving Neverland: Who’s Really Behind the Michael Jackson ‘Expose’?
https://newspunch.com/leaving-neverland-michael-jackson-expose/

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2019 at 12:32 PM, jarrylf said:

 He lied about having journals and tried his hardest not to have them turned over to the court so he couldn't be questioned about saying making these claims will make him relevant after years of "joking" and saying he'd do this if he ever needed to.:lmao:

Except, his witness statement was stricken for the blatant lying.....which didn't and don't help his claims boo

Wow....that...doesn't make sense at all, especially in Safechuck's case who was essentially a teenager for most of what he alleges, and it's pretty odd how it doesn't here yet in real cases with real abuse victims (especially from celebs) they remember things so clearly and so vividly, yet with Michael Jackson being Michael Jackson......it's weird how it's JUST him where that's what these 2 have in common......how telling

Again I ask, so you're saying no MJ accuser ever went for the money before they came out with the claims? Also....Cochren was only worked with MJ once....he was kinda sorta dead by the time of the 2nd trial.... :coffee:

I totally agree! Cons like ROBson & SafeCHECK discredit the whole #MeToo movement and make it harder for true victims to be believed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 years later...

I'm sorry to revive this, but I read some of your comments...

Thank you for all your views on this, but I made a podcast called "King Radio" debunking Wade Robson and James Safechuck, scalping every accuser, and coming after Oprah.

For people who didn't hear, Wade and James have both been dismissed. Though this doesn't mean Michael wasn't absolved, it makes Wade and James look like Robson and SafeCheck/casechucked. Why? Because though they claimed this wasn't about money, they'd been suing the estate for literally millions since 2013.

James was found looking up rings on etsy.

Oh, yes he did. Mhm. Yes, chile.

And Wade wrote in his book:

"Michael Jackson changed the world and, more personally, my life forever. He is the reason I dance, the reason I make music, and one of the main reasons I believe in the pure goodness of humankind. He has been a close friend of mine for 20 years. His music, his movement, his personal words of inspiration and encouragement and his unconditional love will live inside of me forever. I will miss him immeasurably, but I know that he is now at peace and enchanting the heavens with a melody and a moonwalk."

But he tried to fuck you and lick your bussy and your crack right? Wade's fanfictions are the reason why gay people like me or people in the LGBTQ+ community are completely misunderstood by some on the left and right. They are the reason why Tomi Lahren and Ben Shapiro exist and go on a rant about Jazz being trans.

Did y'all know the stuff they said in LN are literally identical to the stuff written by Victor M. Gutierrez. You know, the author who was a member of NAMBLA? The one who wrote that "diary" of Jordan Chandler?

Jordan Chandler? You know, the guy whose father manipulated him and drugged him to plant "memories" into his head of MJ abusing him? Gavin and Jordan admit that they lied even after Mike's death, so Wade and James saying they wish they had been able to help them is complete bullshit.

We, the moonwalkers/soldiers of love (I separate them and I've explained why on my podcast episode "The Sound of Shading Part 2"), are mad at Oprah because she got involved in this fuckery.

Some of you might say, "well, what does that have to do with anything? She's supporting "victims"

The problem is that this bitch had the fake easter egg balls to come after a dead black man, but just like Chrissy Tiegen and John Legend, stood by Harvey Weinstein's side and even kissed him. She got on board with Leaving Neverland, but decided to not get Harvey's ass for something they falsely accuse Michael of doing.

Even as a soldier of love, I do believe Michael did weird things (i.e. balcony, some surgery, etc. [long story short lol]), but he wasn't this crazy pedophile monster who went around looking for kids at dance competitions as his next victims. He didn't have a list of children's names in red underlined.

Also, if Michael had child porn in his estate/Neverland, he would've been arrested. Point blank period. It's literally a crime to possess child pornography of any kind. Just wanted to make that clear considering I'm 15 and was abused as a child. So I do know what I'm talking about. Just a warning for that one crazy bitch who will try to come after me.

Oh, and before people try to use LaToya as an example, she retracted her claims. She even went as far to say Michael was murdered (people wanted his catalog, etc). So I wish for the MJHaters/MJGuilters to stop trying to use her words out of context and for my fellow Moonwalkers/Soldiers of Love to stop shading and dissing her. She's apologized, Michael forgave her, it's in her book Starting Over, buy it.

Anyway, y'all have prolly said all of this, but I couldn't help but share my piece since I'm a survivor and wish the guilters who aren't would stop trying to lynch a dead person of my culture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9ZR6wLMJrg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tem3qvWx19s

And just so you know, yes, I have watched the documentary. But unlike some of the peasants guilters, I've read the FBI documents and also read the transcript of LN.

For Wade and his dancing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eKp3Yhf9P4

Ooh, here's a video that debunks even the TRAILER for Leaving Neverland: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-VhAzofoO4

 

Now, Imma go eat my red velvet cupcake. But if I were a guilter, I would go and weep like Jesus, pray, ask for forgiveness, and just spend some time and have peace with God.

Oh and for the Janet fans that stand with the MJ fans and I, thank you so much. Please stay away from the LNHBO reddit tho. They're full of lies and ignore the facts that I just stated here. They're literally obsessed with us (calling us deranged, toxic, evil). It's pretty awful over there. I know what I just said might make you curious to go over there, but please don't. It almost took a toll on my mental health.

If you want some comedy and facts, watch TLP's video: 

 

Thank you for reading. Imma eat my cupcake and go listen to Let's Wait A While, Scream, and When I Think Of You.

A funny thing for you guys to listen to this from TLP. At 1:29, there's a parody of Janet singing Formation by Bey. At 7:53, there's a parody of Janet singing BBHMM by Riri.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
On 3/30/2019 at 4:52 PM, Arckangel said:

I swear to G*D, I do not believe a word of it. SafeCHECK claims he "had sex" with MJ above the train station on a daily basis, and the "abuse" occurred from 1988-1992. UNFORTUNATELY for him, the train station wasn't built until end of 1993; it was completed by 1994 right before MJ married LMP.

PROOF:

 
 
SafeCHECK, ROBson and Dan GREED are three CROOKS capitalizing on the #MeToo movement, and by doing so, they're making it harder for genuine victims of sex abuse (incl. child sex abuse) to be believed, and they're giving #MeToo a terrible name.

More receipts those guys are lying through their teeth!

 

http://themichaeljacksonallegations.com


Leaving Neverland has already been thoroughly debunked; though purported to be a "reality" documentary series, it's fiction—scripted fiction, a perversion of reality. In the film, audio messages were shortened to give the impression MJ only wanted to see the kids, but he also wanted the parents around.

What stuns me the most is not even the sheer cruelty and deception of those three crooks but how utterly GULLIBLE and NAÏVE so many can be, willing to spend 4 hours on Leaving Neverland + 1 hour on After Neverland (the Oprah interview), but 0 hour, 0 minute on any rebuttal video, article or website. And this is why I find the Sundance Film Festival, HBO, Channel 4 and Oprah utterly irresponsible and sketchy. It's like a jury only getting to listen to the prosecution, their arguments, their witnesses, their evidence and not ever getting to listen to the defence, their arguments, their witnesses and their evidence. That's a total and complete travesty of justice!

Those celebrities who blindly believe Leaving Neverland and won't even bother do any research are even more foolish 'cause they might be next! I swear to G*D, anytime I read anything negative, salacious or damning about any of those stars that believe MJ is guilty, I shall believe it 100%.


Leaving Neverland: Who’s Really Behind the Michael Jackson ‘Expose’?
https://newspunch.com/leaving-neverland-michael-jackson-expose/

I honestly think it’s far more likely that super Michael or Janet Jackson  fans are the “blinded” ones.  I’m a MASSIVE JJ stan, but I’m not gonna pretend like it’s not a very real possibility MJ was guilty of inappropriate behavior with these kids.  His reality was warped. We all know it.  

Everyone is screaming to believe victims when they come forward, but does that only apply when the accused isn’t a worshipped pop-culture hero?  
 

I kind of understand Janet not wanting to believe such a thing as his sister.  Her statement of “he didn’t have it in him” sounded almost cliche, though.  Doesn’t every mom/brother/sister think that when a loved one is in a similar situation.  It just doesn’t compute for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

That film is TRASH! There was no need to even bring this in here! This was strictly a movie based off of nothing but 2 middle aged men facing their own financial ruin! It's completely laughable, and was debunked withing weeks of its release! Janet would not appreciate this AT ALL !

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...