J.

Hey guys! You can’t argue with people determined to not understand, are unnecessarily defensive, and suffer from mild stupidity.

I don’t really care about her not responding, but every comment doesn’t require fumes. Lolz

15 hours ago, Bailey. said:

if it were on any day but JT's SB performance, you guys rode that of all things and call it appreciation. I call it what it was, an opportunity to get Janet's name out there associated with Justin, thats not a kind gesture. And for the sake of argument let's say it was, an appreciation day, she's still NOT required to thank you. If anything be grateful you made an impact and keep it moving

Ok like I said, he’s calling the day of appreciation bullshit.

Mind your posts

2 hours ago, Bailey. said:

  what part of "no part" are you folks NOT understanding? She's not going to thank you for putting her name in some bullshit she herself didnt stoop so low as to "gain" anything from it, she's bigger than that SB moment, and will not associate herself with it....if you want a Janet Jackson appreciation day, buy her albums, buy concert tickets, thank her for the legendary career she achieved well before 2004, and learn to ignore the SB and stop using it to prop Janet up against a lessor talent. If you're going to celebrate Janet and feel you must, do it right, celebrate her, no strings attached..... dayum shoulda said thank you, she kept it "woke" Im not gonna thank ya'll for opening up the coon door I know what time it is "I WILL NOT"!!!

So now the day of appreciation was bullshit?

5 hours ago, Mr. Wonder said:

That counterargument isn't valid. We're examining the role and expectation of the induced, not the inducer. 

He loves to spin something when he's losing. Hopping from one failed argument to the next.

On ‎2‎/‎6‎/‎2018 at 9:56 AM, Mr. Wonder said:

Game, let's not play with each other. I posted an article that outright refutes your statement. I also stated that her Spotify listeners increased by over 2k, and that's just one streaming platform. Her music also rose on iTunes. This is all since Sunday. You can not continue to argue that trending on Twitter has no benefit when statistical evidence debunks your argument.

I stopped watching Scandal two seasons ago. Now I have to catch up just to watch this one episode.

19 hours ago, DarkStormSC said:

I’m going to be couch crashing. Try Airnb. I’ve seen some reasonably priced in nyc.

I know someone from college that lives there. We're not super close or anything, so I don't know if she would let me stay there. lol

20 hours ago, DarkStormSC said:

Yep. Got regular tickets (not Vip), but it’s my first music festival and with Janet! So I’m excited.

I just bought mine. Now I have to find somewhere to stay. I cannot do an nyc hotel ?

1 hour ago, DarkStormSC said:

Got my passes ordered for Saturday! 

You must have America Express?

I have to go.  I don’t really care to go to essence 

I can listen to him talk about the music biz all day

And damn we share some of the same points on the Super Bowl....it would look good for him but what would she gain? Wow!

yes @ this newly single attire

On ‎12‎/‎30‎/‎2017 at 9:34 PM, MorganR said:

 

This 35 year old woman

well the forum's back up and running

you mean visually? Because yeah the photoshoot and video looks >

Yeah it's not touching the first three tours but everything else is on point. 

She's been through over 40 shows. Non - postponing self   

When has Gil ever been accurate? He's always either lying or not knowing what he's talking about.

The second half is just completely unbelievable 

This is the most she's been consistently photographed in a long time 

Between this and the Halloween costume...she would've slayed an action film 

Ageless

You're not. Just wait for the next comment you don't like.

I'll say this for the ones I think have common sense...

First of all, the fact that y'all think you can dictate who's a fan and who's not is really hilarious. As if you're really that important. And that's no shade.

Most of the arguments and "negativity" on here starts with your fumes over simple statements. It takes two to tango and you all know how to get the party started. Austin's comment would have probably blown over quickly, but immediately after he hit post there were post after post of complaints. (See post about which comments get the most attention.) I mean he clearly stated it was for those who cared about the boxscores. Should he make another thread? Probably not because you will venture there too making the same remarks acting all high and mighty.

This thread has mostly been "positive," so maybe look again.

Beating a dead horse is having this same back and forth every other week about the same thing for two years. "Let Janet live" over and over again as if she won't continue living.

Also, do some of you have lives outside of Janet?

I personally don't care about her boxscores, just think the warped perceptions on here are pretty interesting.

But you are though with this conversation.