Jump to content

wayneashleymusic

Members
  • Posts

    459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by wayneashleymusic

  1. I was 15 when GTIG came out... it was my first true exposure to Janet, and when I became a true fan.  I remember watching the GTIG video and just being amazed at seeing so many beautiful representations of blackness.  It astonished me that Janet, for all her wealth and success, could feel so strongly connected to her people and her heritage.  

    I ran out and bought The Velvet Rope, and BOY was I in for a shock!!  I sat in my room listened to the whole album non-stop, then went in again.  

    • Upvote 2
  2. That's because the Hot 100 chart and R&B/Hip Hop charts have different sets of rules, clearly. And it's also clear that the rules regarding musicians like Herb Alpert doing an album with featured artists was different back then as well. It has nothing to do with her legacy being erased. The same thing was done to Lisa Keith who sang lead on "Making Love In the Rain". The song's chart position isn't attributed to her either.

    http://www.billboard.com/artist/307492/lisa-keith/chart

    But wait! Could it be possible that Billboard and the media is also trying to erase Lisa Keith's legacy with this omission as well?! Is a Lisa Keith's Legacy Matters campaign on the horizon?!

    Thanks for pointing out Billboard's selective and inconsistent recollection of Hot 100 history.  To not credit Ms. Keith on Making Love in the Rain (or Diamonds), yet to have somehow updated the chart on Diamonds to show Janet as a feature is not cool.  From the actual album cover, Janet and Lisa should be credited as featured artists for BOTH tracks.  If chart rules evolve, that should be reflected equally.  

    http://vinylalbumcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/herbalpertkeepyoureyeonmesleevefront.png 

     

    • Upvote 1
  3. Well, the only correct thing that was said in here was "It starts with the base," but not for the reasons that were listed. You can't expect others to be aware of Janet's legacy when her own fans can't get facts straight. I'll exclude the plethora of inaccurate facts that exists in campaigns such as Janet's Legacy Matters and Induct Janet and just reference the inaccuracies in this thread. Firstly, Diamonds is not listed as a top 10 by Billboard because it isn't Janet's song, it's Herb Alpert's. That was the rule made by Billboard when the song first impacted the charts way back in 1987. So did Billboard have a vendetta against her then as well? And We Are The World for Haiti is no more a hit for Janet than We Are the World was for LaToya. Phoning in vocals as part of an ensemble and calling it a hit for her is just overreaching.

    I already explained the qualifier for WATW 25.  

    And I can guarantee you that by their own calculation, Billboard is including hits as a featured artist for everyone listed.  As a lead artist, Rihanna only has 22 Top 10 hits.  But her count expands when her features are included.  

    But if you need to check Billboard yourself, here's the receipt...  

    http://www.billboard.com/charts/r-b-hip-hop-songs/1987-06-20 

    Don't ya know... RECEIPTS are a guy's best friend!! 

    • Upvote 1
  4. Well, anyway...  

     

    It just needs to be said that album sales are a tough thing to do today with the exception of a precious few folks.  People just experience music differently.  

    Take your a titan seller like Beyonce as an example  Anyone wanna guesstimate her cut of sales from Lemonade??    

    2,500,000 units sold at an avg of $10 per  unit equals $25,000,000

    Pay 40% of that to Sony for distribution costs:  $15,000,000 remains

    Pay 30% of that to the TON of co-writers (63 co-writers on Lemonade, compared just 8 for Janet's Unbreakable):  $10,000,000 remains

    Pay 20% of that for other associated costs:  Parkwood Entertainment makes roughly $8,000,000 in sales from 2,500,000 units.   

     

    Everyone is wondering about Jay-Z's new album not doing well on the charts because it's a Tidal exclusive, but he already made hundreds of millions from Tidal, including his most recent deal with Sprint.  How much could he possibly make by trying to stoke album sales??  Next to nothing when compared to revenue from touring and merch.  

     

    As for Janet, a decent tour will more than cover costs for anything she wants to undertake from new music.  But she could also stand to make a lot of money by offering more in terms of merch.  UWT's choices were pretty limited in that department.  

  5.  

     

    But what even are "great numbers" in the music industry today??  You have number 1 albums almost every week that were far lower than Unbreakable's 1st week sales (hello Halsey 76k sales, how's it going Lorde 82k sales, and even Queen Mary J. Blige78k sales +streaming).  Then you have the rare exception, handful of folks (Adele, Taylor Swift, Beyonce) that can move a sizable number of units.  And then you have rappers that do ok in sales, but people just stream the heck out of their songs so they stay high on the charts.  An album/ new music is basically an excuse to go on tour and reconnect with fans.  From what I can tell, that's all Janet really wants to do. 

    • Upvote 1
  6. No one takes that website seriously and part of her legacy being erased or overlooked has to do with her not being around.  That's not fair but that's the way it is with her.  

    It has to do with one thing... after the Superbowl, she became the scapegoat for indecency in the 2004 election campaign.  Ever since then, the media and much of the music industry has hung her out to dry.  And Janet has been around... she just hasn't been around at their beckoned call because she knows most of them aren't going to give her a fair shake anyway.  

    Beyonce hasn't sat for a proper interview or called into a radio station in 5 years either, but she's a name that is on everyone's lips (which I have no problem with BTW).  But the difference is her career has not yet been tarnished by the media.  So she's following a similar path to Janet and making things about her fans.  

    But as a fan of Janet, it's not cool with me to let these shady moments pass by, so I'm going to point it out.  

  7. As we all know, Billboard magazine is a primary offender.  In a recent article written by Gary Trust, they are discussing artists with the most Top 10 hits... 

     

    "Thoughts," from Khaled's new album, Grateful, released Friday (June 23), and which samples Santana's "Maria Maria," a 10-week Hot 100 No. 1 (featuring The Product G&B) in 2000, marks Rihanna's 31st top 10, the third-best total dating to the Hot 100's Aug. 4, 1958, launch. Here's an updated look at the acts with the most Hot 100 top 10s:

    38, Madonna
    34, The Beatles
    31, Rihanna
    29, Michael Jackson (as a soloist)
    28, Stevie Wonder

     

    Left off of the list was Janet, whom has garnered 28 Hot 100 Top 10 hits... 29 if you are counting We Are The World 25 for Haiti... 

    Here's the list (though many of us on here already know it)... 

    #4 What Have You Done For Me Lately

    #3 Nasty

    #1 When I Think Of You

    #5 Control

    #2 Let's Wait Awhile

    #5 Diamonds (Herb Alpert ft. Janet Jackson & Lisa Keith)

    #1 Miss You Much

    #2 Rhythm Nation

    #1 Escapade

    #4 Alright

    #2 Come Back To Me

    #1 Black Cat

    #1 Love Will Never Do

    #10 The Best Things In Life Are Free (Luther Vandross, Janet Jackson, Bell Biv Devoe an Ralph Tresvant)

    #1 That's The Way Love Goes

    #4 If

    #1 Again

    #10 Because of Love 

    #2 Any Time, Any Place

    #8 You Want This

    #3 Runaway

    #5 Scream (Michael and Janet Jackson)

    #1 Together Again 

    #3 I Get Lonely

    #3 What's It Gonna Be (Busta Rhymes ft. Janet Jackson)

    #1Doesn't Really Matter

    #1 All For You

    #3 Someone To Call My Lover

    #2 We Are The World 25 for Haiti (Artists for Haiti)

  8. I've posted on the subject before, but would like to know what others have seen in terms of members of the media that continue to try and erase Janet's legacy.  If you find blatant omissions of Janet's work, unfounded comments or other subtle forms of shade, post them hear.  If we all know about them, maybe we can all refute them as a community.  

    For those unfamiliar with the issues, this post on The Inquisitr is a good place to start.  

     

  9. I'll check for it but I don't like the whole "Tidal & Sprint" and here's why:

    1) It cheapens the music. It's no longer an art form as it is a marketing campaign 

    2) A partnership with Sprint.. America's least popular Mobile company

    3) Tidal exclusive which means he's losing out on potential income. Yes he owns Tidal and doesn't need money but c'mon

     

    I'm a Tidal subscriber, and have been since they started.  It's a great service, especially for those that are into the behind the scenes things with artists.  But Jay-Z already banked a huge chunk of $200 million from Sprint's stake in the service (as did all the other artist- owners like B, Nicki Minaj, Madonna, Rihanna, etc.), which is probably a heck of a lot more than he would've made on album sales anyway.  

    Tidal's biggest hurdle right now is the fact that Billboard apparently still ignores its streaming data, though I've heard rumors that is about to change.  If so, I think that would bolster the service.  

    And I'll say it again... the sound quality on Tidal is EPIC!!  But I agree he'd get more overall impact if he releases everything at once.  A smarter choice would be to do BTS stuff, additional tracks, etc. via Tidal as that will still drive hardcore fans to sign up.  

  10. While this has some relevance it's just an observation that she's a hit or miss dresser. That's including times she's dressed up vs dressed down. Don't forget the pink tutu kinda look when she was with JD or the weed belt hippie look, or the saggy pants that's been here for years at this point...she has moments where she's hit or miss. It's fine...we can use every excuse ever it's just a part of her simplistic way & it is what it is. 

     

    Yep... and whether it's hit or miss, we still talk about it, as people have been for over 40 years.  #EarnedIt.  

  11. She dresses in a lot of ways which are not meant to generate attention, because right now she doesn't want attention.  I'm sure there's people in London (not super fans, paps or celebrity hounds) that wouldn't recognize her if she's not "dressed up" and/or someone else points it out.  And even for the casual observer that does recognize her, they would have to stop and think for a minute, which is just long enough to get away.  

    I think there's definitely a reason for dressing down when you/re not in "performance mode".  

    • Upvote 1
  12. Ok so I digress.  The comparisons to Ms. Jackson's work are not warranted.  End of story and I take back the comment.  

    On Katy Perry's Witness, it is most certainly not 'complete shit'.  Some of the songs are quite good, and a hell of a lot more inventive than most of what's coming out today.  At least she's trying to do something.  But even on some of the songs that lack lyrical depth, the production is stellar and they are bops which would be welcome on most any playlist.  

     

  13. The album is hit and miss. The title Witness is worth a listen, as are Swish Swish and definitely Pendulum. I think Power and Deja Vu get close to great but don't quite make it. 

    This is not an album that'a going to hit on first listen. And yes I totally agree when I say the era is similar to TVR I'm not saying the albums are similar. Witness isn't as personal, and it lacks the range and focus of TVR, plus the lyrical content isn't as strong (of course that's the case when comparing any Katy Perry album to ANY Janet album). But is taking a huge risk in trying to get woke. 

     

     

    • Upvote 2
  14. So it took me a minute, but after a couple of listens, I have actually come around to Katy Perry's new album Witness and I understand what she's trying to accomplish. Honestly, I think she really is starting to get WOKE and realizes that the superficial pop princess isn't going to cut it anymore. 

    Witness isn't a perfect album, but it sure is a more bold move than most pop stars at the height of their powers would be willing to take. Ironically, the Witness era bare many similarities to Janet Jackson's The Velvet Rope, which was also misunderstood by 90s era critics for it's overt pushing of boundaries, but is heralded twenty years later as one of the greatest albums in pop music. 

     

    What do y'all think? 

  15. there is a wonderful interview with Jimmy on Pandora Questlove Supreme  radio station, it is in two parts probably about 2 hours and Jimmy talks about his beginnings and more in very deep detail....look it up if you get a chance folks get listening material

    OMG yes this interview is EVERYTHING!!  He gives so much T on Perspective Records/ A&M, why some artists succeeded and failed.  Seriously this is a can't miss series for music fans.  

  16. In a brief look at the Library of Congress' National Recording Registry, I was shocked to learn that none of Janet Jackson's works have been inducted.  Each year, the Librarian of Congress and their staff select 25 recordings to be inducted based on the cultural significance and impact which the audio recording made.  

    Interestingly enough, the list doesn't have a lot of pop music, but Michael Jackson's Thriller was inducted in 2007.  

    Any American citizen can nominate recordings they feel are of cultural significance.  So I ask... what recordings by Ms. Janet are her most impactful?  Both albums or recording tracks can be considered.  

     

    I plan to nominate a few, but would love to hear the forum's thoughts and justificaions.  

  17. I just appreciate ET's coverage.  The report and never seem to go too far overboard (at least not during this era).  

    And hmm... a big reveal followed immediately by a Netflix series which chronicles her training and tour preparation??  Doesn't sound so far-fetched after this story.  

     

×
×
  • Create New...