Reyna ♔ Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 She may be pregnant, but Beyonce has no problem showing off some skin despite her baby bump. The mom-to-be bypassed maternity wear yesterday in NYC, as she hit one Fashion Week event in a sexy black leather and jersey cut-out dress from Michael Kors, which exposed her sides. No hint of a growing belly there! If the dress looks familiar, there's a reason: Leighton Meester wore the exact same one to the premiere of "The Roommate" back in January. Who do you think wore it better? Source: http://www.toofab.com/2011/09/14/beyonce-pregnant-leather-dress-fashion-week-photos/ Now, explain to me why her stomach looks MUCH smaller here then it did on the VMAs. Here she looks like 2-3, There she looked like 4-5. What the hell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share Posted September 15, 2011 And no, I didn't feel like searching for the official thread. Deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Baby Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 She looks preggers to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share Posted September 15, 2011 She looks preggers to me She still looks pregnant, of course. I wanna know why she looks like 2-3 months pregnant here when she looked like 4-5 months pregnant on the VMAs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSimba Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Oh I thought those were minus signs! See I saw the 2+2=4 and ... never mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 It's the angle. And the dress is an empire waist, it's cut just below the breast so that the stomach doesn't show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share Posted September 15, 2011 It's the angle. And the dress is an empire waist, it's cut just below the breast so that the stomach doesn't show. Ahhh alright. That explains it.. Btw, what is with the facial expression on the photographer in the background? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dungeon Dragon Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 She looks well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn1814 Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 She looks well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.