Evil.

Marvel.

I love Clark, Bruce and Diana....but they would get their asses kicked.

Come on bitch!!!! Slay them.

The law of the land is just when Michael is dead...but when he was alive, it was the law of the land that nearly put him in prison for life based on bogus charges.

I'll be the objective MJ fan.

It seems that no one has factored into the equation the fact that Michael was heavily medicated in the last decade of his career, as proven by his own family and friends....and in this state, he was undoubtedly taken advantage of. Factor this into the various concerns that Michael feared for his life, and his net worth doubled almost immediately after his death....I smell bullshit. That is more than enough reason to question every single will.

He was used throughout his entire career and people expect me to believe the executors of his Estate have his best interest? Please.

Some may say he wanted Branca and McClain back on board. These are the same people that believed he wanted to do 50 shows in London.

So now Randy is up to no good? And Janet's loyal to Randy?

Is this the same Randy that Michael credited for support throughout the child molestation trial? Is this the same Janet that has been in Michael's corner since the beginning?

I'm going to need receipts boo.

Wasn't there a point where neither Katherine nor the children were receiving any money from the Estate?

Doesn't the will prove emphatically that none of the Jackson family aside from Katherine will benefit from Michael's will? What exactly do they have to gain from the Estate?

When Katherine dies, the kids go to Diana Ross.

I wonder if anyone has ever thought about the fact that maybe an 82 year old woman may not be well enough to raise two teenagers and a small child.

I wonder why no one has said anything about Tito's son going straight to the courts to assume guardianship in Katherine's absence.

No one has addressed the rhinestone-studded elephant in the room....

Shall I?

Innocent until proven guilty, love. That's the law of the land.

The irony of it all...chile please.

Pretty much. The only thing that really changes in the FOUR WILLS/TRUSTS is a couple executors(though John Branca is mentioned by name IN ALL FOUR and deservingly so ) and the addition of Michael's children by name. Even still, what the public believes is always opinion and speculation. The court approved it after careful review. The date/location question isn't enough to throw the current Will out, especially when every other known Will/Trust names the same head-executor, beneficiaries and distributions. What would throw the Will out is either another much later Will or the current one(as well as executor actions) is/are not in tune with the testator's wishes. Since all four basically say the EXACT same thing, it gives no evidence to believe that the Executors aren't doing what Michael wanted. The 120 day statute is up and no-one who would have another Will has presented one. No-one would wait 3 years to bring up another Will of Michael's especially if they felt the current one isn't what he wanted. However, we can see that it is.

I know all about of the 'legalities' of Michael's will, boo.

Let's keep this within the context of my question...leaving the spin to the Estate and TMZ, shall we? That is unless you don't know how Michael Jackson could have signed his will in Los Angeles when there is undoubted proof that he was in New York that entire weekend.

Why would Janet involve herself and her lawyers in the legal matters of her brother's estate when she nor her relatives have nothing to gain?

What does she know that we don't?

Angelina Jolie

Demi Moore

Mila Jovovich

Lucy Liu

Charlize Theron

Helen Mirren

Jamie Lee Curtis

Jada Pinkett-Smith

Linda Hamilton

Michelle Rodriguez

Angela Bassett

Cameron Diaz

Queen Latifah

Grace Jones

...any combination of these women in the film would slay.

So the public is supposed to believe that the suspicions regarding the signing of Michael Jackson's will was due to the fact that he merely signed the wrong date?

..like he signed July 26, 2002 instead of July 27, 2002?

TMZ has ALWAYS been a tabloid...

...and until there is irrefutable evidence that the Estate isn't involved with TMZ's outlandish publications, they are guilty as shit.

That would slay.

I choose C.

This will be on TMZ by tonight.

Since they're coming back to common sense, how could Michael Jackson have signed his will in Los Angeles if he were in New York with Al Sharpton?

a. He had telekinetic abilities.

b. He had a double assuming his affairs in New York.

c. Bubbles forged his signature.

d. Michael never signed the will.

Yes bitch!!!!!!!!

I'm beyond excited.

The executors of Michael Jackson's estate are clearly trying to make Janet look bad....which only makes TMZ look worse and them look obvious and desperate.

They fucked with the wrong Jackson.

Ruff Ryders Anthem still goes hard to this day....

"Lil Kim the Queen Bee, so you best take heed...shall I proceed?"

dats fat

Sayeth the heterosexual....

Kidding...

Shoot him.

Bullshit.

That gif slayed my soul....

And representing the country of Caublanasia......

Christina Aguilera Channels Billie Holiday for New Album Promo

http://www.dailyglow.com/christina-aguilera-channels-billie-holiday-for-new-album-promo-0808.html

In a sumptuous photo for the pop star's upcoming, as-yet-untitled album, Christina Aguilera channels a songstress from the past. Wearing a large white flower over one ear, her hair pulled back in a sleek style, the starlet looked more than a little like Billie Holiday.

The stunning, black-and-white photo goes along with the meaningful theme of the album. The star was quoted in Just Jared about the feel for the new tunes, which will be "a very heartfelt, deep-rooted, and introspective record."

In addition to her platinum blonde hair, the starlet wore a dramatic, elegant makeup look. Her eyebrows were tinted a deeper shade than her hair, angled and drawn in thickly. The glamour of her look brings to mind many Hollywood stars of the past, including Greta Garbo, Rita Hayworth, and Marilyn Monroe.

The eye makeup used on Aguilera was rich and lovely. A highlighting shade was used in the middle of her upper lids, then shaded with a deeper hue on the outer edges, spreading across the eyelid crease. Her lashes were super thick, with lustrous black mascara. Her upper lashes were thickened by false lashes. Find out how to get the false lash look and dramatic eyes, in this guide to bold and superglamorous eye effects.

Because she is Christina Aguilera, after all, the pop star didn't stop there with the striking makeup. She layered her lips in a deep scarlet, creamy lipstick. On her nails, she used another dark red hue to go with her lips.

Cher has revealed in cryptic tweets to her followers that she is working on a song with Christina Aguilera.

http://www.rte.ie/ten/2012/0809/cher.html

The 66-year-old singer hinted at a collaboration last night between the pair, who worked together and have remained close since their roles in the 2010 film Burlesque.

When asked if Aguilera is the 'mystery' collaborator on her next album, Cher responded: "Not say YES not say NO? Say HOPE ! Luv her![sic]" followed by "I got So excited bout [Christina], but its not set" fuelling speculation that the two are in talks to record together.

Both are in the studio at the moment, with Aguilera penning tracks for her next album. Aguilera tweeted this week "Just wrapped up another great studio session- WOW- seriously can't WAIT for you guys to hear what I've been working on!!"