art

Janhova, why so flawless, perfect, godly, etc.?!?

and anyone denying that she looks 10 years younger than her actual age is just pressed

Cheers (Drink to That)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! Don't do it!!

So it's actually leaked now? Can someone post a link?

http://twitter.com/ileaks/status/1766579788324864

So is it confirmed that it's not him?

Don't do it hunnies. janet has never released a song that bad.

Yasss! Prince! He's unmoved :lmao:

I'm still waiting...

|

|

|

V

No need to wait:

post where I stated 2000 watts was altered...

I'll wait.

Already did, 7 times at that, failed stan.

I said an altered Mike Jack vocal still sounds like Mike Jack, and then I posted two tracks where MJ sounds different compared to what the public is use to.

Chile please!

Damage control fail.

You proceeded by posting a Youtube video of '2000 watts'.

Again, Stan fail. Sit down.

but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

..and how many times do I have to tell you the lead vocal is the promblem as it does NOT sound like Michael Jackson.

It doesn't have to altered..it was an example of different Michael Jackson vocal (from most of his stuff) STILL sounding like Michael Jackson....not the case with "Breaking News"

They've released a track with portions of Michael's vocal mixed into ir, but an actual Michael Jackson track.

No, you clearly stated that '2000 watts' was altered yet still sounded like MJ.

Stan fail.

I'm not trying to start...I'm just stating the obvious

Janet's "Make Me"/"Nothing" vocals >>>> Mike's vocals in this.

:lol:

How many times do I have to say the issue is the LEAD VOCAL track.

I know what background vocals, harmonies , etc are...that is NOT what I'm talking about.

I'm talking about the LEAD VOCAL TRACK...

Now you can make an argument that the LEAD vocals in this track have been altered, but even then a altered Michael Jackson vocal will still sounds like Michael Jackson

or

(edit - sorry posted the wrong link)

I don't hear the same voice (meaning that it still sounds like Michael Jackson's voice...altered or not) in the LEAD vocal track for "Breaking News," hence it being suspect

How many times do I have to tell you that the lead vocals aren't the problem. It's actually the layered back-up vocals that sound computer tweekd.

2000 watts was NOT altered at all. Teddy Riley already clarified this too. I can't believe you call yourself a MJ stan and you don't know this

Seriously. I can't believe you'd think Sony would RISK releasing a Michael Jackson song without it being him. Give me a break.

No...I like the music, as the vocals began I KNEW that wasn't Mike. I'm speaking SPECIFICALLY about the VOCALS on this track, not the track itself...

If his voice is so different please explain this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDDQhI00fh8

Mike singing "Human Nature" LIVE during "This Is It" (one of the FEW songs he actually sung live in that rehearsal).

The person singing this track and the person singing on Human Nature are totally different individuals.

Seriously?

Please, listen closely. Ignore the the vocals layered on top of the original. It is him. I'm sure that the back-up vocals aren't fully him probably tweeked in the studio.

i wonder if that song was recorded during his drug haze

I think it was you can even hear him snort towards the 2:00 mark.

I already stated previously in this thread that I didn't believe the reports...infact if you go to one of the few recent MJ threads, I said I felt the stories were planted by the estate to cause intrigue over this project...that ALL changed when I heard this track.

That's not Mike. Those lead vocals are suspect as hell...

I think you just don't want this to be MJ because the song is crap or you're forgetting his voice has aged.

It's him. Deal.

I could ask you the same...

Those lead vocals are VERY suspect!

I think you're high or you're letting the Jackson's claims clouding your judgment

The lead vocals aren't suspect at ALL. The back-up vocals are!

stop laughin 2 Mike

It sounds so autotuned.

say worrrrd??!!!

then again Sony music probably had an engineer alter the vocals during the mix down......................i can see they bytch azzezz doin it 2

I don't understand why anyone can't hear it It sounds like an aged Invincible-esque type of vocals. But it IS him.

:blink: :blink:

Parts of it, perhaps, but the whole track...no

And I'm not talking about background vocals, harmonies, etc...most of the lead vocals were not Mike.

Are you high?

It is him. The back-up vocals aren't all him though. Especially the "Michael Jacksonnnn" part isn't.

But DEAD at "Michael Jacksonnnnnnnn"

That IS Michael Jackson.