Reyna ♔

Just sayin' Yeah. Confusing, we know. It's cool. I know you're kidding :lol:

Uh huh. NEVER.WILL.THERE.BE.ANOTHER.JANET. .

Kelly will NEVER be Janhova. Not even if she jacks Ciara's stash of wet-curl weaves, steals Karin Lawson's clothes, and digs up Eartha's cat suit. She can have some shine. But not the status and crown I still love you, babe Amy

Her weave- Jacked Her one piece- A mess Her make up and nails- Off point. The shoes- A fail Final Score: C-/D+ In her own words: "Lights! Somebody gettin' fired! Hey hey!"

Sorry you feel that way, baby doll.

That's cute for you

The instrumental behind her vocals is giving me Britney tees

Babs. You are a genius, I know. But you are slipping, baby doll. Really, I love you...but no. Just...no.

She is not giving me "fabulous" with that cover. Sorry

Big Blow to Defense In MJ Manslaughter Trial The judge in the Michael Jackson manslaughter trial just undercut a big part of the defense, by ruling 16 hours of rehearsal footage for the "This Is It" tour doesn't show MJ to be in poor health. Dr. Conrad Murray's lawyers wanted the outtakes to prove Jackson was very ill in the days before his death. The argument goes -- he was already dying, so Dr. Murray can't be held responsible for his death. But Judge Michael Pastor ruled ... the outtakes were valuable to Sony Pictures -- which objected to turning over the footage -- and the video did not show MJ in poor health. If the hours of video show a healthy Michael, it undercuts a major line of defense for Murray. Source: http://www.tmz.com/2011/07/25/doctor-conrad-murray-propofol-big-blow-to-defense-mj-michael-jackson-manslaughter-trial-this-is-it-tour-footage-rehearsal-sony-pictures/

^^^ Oooo that is messed up as hell :lmao:

^^^ Kiiiii :lmao:

:lmao:

Not entirely. You're the only one who'd think that.

Only to you

So if they basically mean the same, why not use all there to cover all the bases? Case closed.

Because all three are possibilities separately. Dumbass. You just fucked your disagreement over because your "debunking" statements actually make sense for my argument.

There are ways to get around Privacy settings. Known fact. That's why it requires hacking. So take your own advice.

Leaked photos can/may/will escalate into worse. ALL BECAUSE OF WHO SHE IS. That has got to register SOMETHING in your mind. I'm against comparing Michael to Joe. Two different men, with two different ways of parenting. Insulting Joe because of the bullshit he did, sure. Though I won't do much because if his children have forgiven him, then I shouldn't have to continue wit any bashing.

1a) Because they're kids, she THOUGHT it would be fine. OBVIOUSLY NOT. 1b)It's very relevant. Damn, nothing EVER gets through that thick ass skull of yours. Not even common sense.

1a)Paris is her grandbaby. More than likely, she didn't know everything about the Internet, but figured she could trust that nothing would happen since they're just kids. Obviously, not. Yeah, dumb shit. 1b)because you do. I've seen the threads and the posts. That last bit was highly unnecessary

You make a hell of alot of sense. That is why I gave you a +1. I get the fact that children shouldn't have legitimate over-bearing parents, but sheltering them and protecting them from things YOU KNOW can/may/will harm them is what parents SHOULD be doing. Saying that "they're gonna do it anyway" or "I don't wanna be too forceful, I wanna be my kids' best friend" is idiotic. More often than not, sometimes a parent has to put their foot down on certain things. Just because something is popular, doesn't mean everyone or anyone should be involved in it.