SloLove Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/67440.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Funny how they determine this 7 years after the fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idrag4mj Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SloLove Posted November 2, 2011 Author Share Posted November 2, 2011 Funny how they determine this 7 years after the fact. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lexus97 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 CBS Janet Jackson Super Bowl Fine Found Improper By Appeals Court PHILADELPHIA — A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld its finding that the Federal Communications Commissions acted improperly in fining CBS over the fleeting exposure of Janet Jackson's breast during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show. A three-judge panel from 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled that the FCC improperly assessed a $550,000 fine against the network for the so-called "wardrobe malfunction" that lasted just over half a second. During the Super Bowl performance in Houston, Justin Timberlake ripped off Jackson's bustier, briefly exposing her breast and a silver sunburst "shield" covering her nipple. In arguments last year, the FCC argued that CBS should have been aware the performers might add shock value to the act. "CBS had a duty to investigate," FCC lawyer Jack Lewis argued. The network countered that regulators were now trying to apply different standards to words and images despite previously excusing fleeting instances of both. The Supreme Court last year ordered the appeals panel to reconsider its 2008 decision, citing a ruling in a Fox television-led challenge, when it said the FCC could threaten fines over the use of a single curse word on live TV. In the majority opinion, 3rd Circuit Judge Marjorie Rendell wrote that the Fox opinion did nothing to undermine the earlier decision on the CBS fine and, in fact, confirms the appeals panel's ruling. The FCC "arbitrarily and capriciously departed from its prior policy excepting fleeting broadcast material" in assessing the fine, Rendell wrote. The same panel initially sided with the network in 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lexus97 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 MY BAD WRONG SIDE AND SLO BEAT ME TO IT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lexus97 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 PHILADELPHIA — A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld its finding that the Federal Communications Commissions acted improperly in fining CBS over the fleeting exposure of Janet Jackson's breast during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show. A three-judge panel from 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled that the FCC improperly assessed a $550,000 fine against the network for the so-called "wardrobe malfunction" that lasted just over half a second. During the Super Bowl performance in Houston, Justin Timberlake ripped off Jackson's bustier, briefly exposing her breast and a silver sunburst "shield" covering her nipple. In arguments last year, the FCC argued that CBS should have been aware the performers might add shock value to the act. "CBS had a duty to investigate," FCC lawyer Jack Lewis argued. The network countered that regulators were now trying to apply different standards to words and images despite previously excusing fleeting instances of both. The Supreme Court last year ordered the appeals panel to reconsider its 2008 decision, citing a ruling in a Fox television-led challenge, when it said the FCC could threaten fines over the use of a single curse word on live TV. In the majority opinion, 3rd Circuit Judge Marjorie Rendell wrote that the Fox opinion did nothing to undermine the earlier decision on the CBS fine and, in fact, confirms the appeals panel's ruling. The FCC "arbitrarily and capriciously departed from its prior policy excepting fleeting broadcast material" in assessing the fine, Rendell wrote. The same panel initially sided with the network in 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SloLove Posted November 2, 2011 Author Share Posted November 2, 2011 MY BAD WRONG SIDE AND SLO BEAT ME TO IT (points and laughs) ha ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Janhova prevails, yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kishi Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 This is dusty, but good news I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 This is dusty, but good news I guess. It's about damn time this chapter in her career has "officially" closed, and I feel that this vindicates her titty. Perhaps this is a stepping stone for America to not be so uptight about everything. Yet another barrier slowly being chipped away by Janhova, even if she's doing it indirectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
switchblade330 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 i'm soooo happy this BULLSHYTT is FINALLY fuckin OVER !!! yet look at all the damage/repucussions that was done 2 Janet's career please don't get me started cause i'm getting FUCKING ANGRY all over again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.