Jump to content

Illi

Members
  • Posts

    2,418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Posts posted by Illi

  1. 4 minutes ago, Mr. Wonder said:

    Yes, it is. We have a credible source, a press release from Janet's team, that says 7 million. Why argue with the credible source? 

    AFY sold 7 million per Janet's team. And that's final. 

    I'm not, but that doesn't mean what he posted doesn't warrant discussion.

    Agree to disagree.

  2. 4 minutes ago, Game For Now said:

    Right!!! If his cosmetic surgeries, weird man-child behaviors, and illicit drug use that eventually killed him didn’t tarnish his legacy... sexually abusing children won’t either. His legacy is untarnishable 🤷🏾‍♂️

    Yet it’s the Wackos going bananas over this documentary

     

    What I meant was that would nail his coffin in terms of his legacy. Absolutely no one in their right mind think he didn't have any issues, even is craziest fans.

    The axe grinders are really hoping that this turns fans against him.

  3. 8 minutes ago, Mr. Wonder said:

    It's fabricating, and it's annoying. There's no need to inflate sales. 

    It's 7 million. Janet's team confirmed it. Leave it at that. 

    You're pontificating here. I agree with the 7 million, but the 9 million wasn't exactly pulled out of his ass. So I dont get the annoying part.

     

    • Upvote 1
  4. 37 minutes ago, Game For Now said:

     It doesn’t matter if they were in love or “messing around for perks”... MJ still molested these men when they were boys. They were still buddy-buddy during the trial and the victim didn’t see MJ in that light. Again, that’s the relationship/power MJ had on him. 

    Shit happens dude. Timing to bring up sexual abuse happens after the abuser is dead.. it’s not rare for that to occur. It would be more bizarre if he just lashed out during trial when the defense called him to testify

    I don't actually believe that statement unless you can say Michael opened some doors after the trial. It was only a hypothetical case that would make your argument credible. And like I've stated before, he could only have so much control if he had the ripest opportunity to pull the trigger.

    Yeah, shit happens. His career fell off and he (Wade) needs a scapegaot

     

  5. 1 hour ago, Game For Now said:

    The whole point in bringing up the trial/perjury is because the one that testified lied under oath to protect his buddy (MJ). He lied to protect him..

    The one that is a lie is the one he said under oath 

    He lied to protect him as any of his wackos would. Imagine being so close with your abuser that you’d lie under oath... it has happened.. it happens daily with domestic abusers “it was my fault” mentality. It happened here. MJ definitely intimidated the witness

    Too many times, society tries to silence victims of abuse... believing the abuser bc of money, power, status in his career.. that is this case. You rather believe the weirdo with a literal amusement park and “traveling companions” than the victims. 

    No other victim is going to come forward bc they are not believe IMMEDIATELY

    The only way this holds waters is if they were consciously messing around for perks. If anything the trial was the perfect time to nail him. The public and media would have believed him then.

    Him only saying something when Mike isn't around to defend himself will always be seen as disingenuous.

    • Upvote 4
  6. 7 hours ago, JoeJoe said:

    I hope his estate sues the fuck out of them and I hope Janet helps spearhead the campaign!:angry:

    Nah, I think Janet should try to stay out of it. The estate seems to have enough power to handle things on its own.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
  7. 1 hour ago, Game For Now said:

    That model ain’t tall :lmao: 

    Y’all are too quick judge and literally cannot be pleased.

    Janet would have killed this look but she decided to wear that wig.

    Janet wears what she wants too.. take that for what it’s worth :lol: 

    She's taller than Janet.

    But if I dont care for it, I dont care for it.

    I just don't feel the need to beat a dead horse.

  8. 1 minute ago, Rocknet said:

    I think this is a watershed moment for great entertainers in music that are not seen as traditional rock artists. Again, Janet has open the door for those that will make a case they deserve induction as well, despite not being "rock" artists in the traditional sense. Having the Hall induct Janet sets precedent for Iconic acts that have been dismissed before now.

    Honestly I think it will cause the Hall to look more at urban contemporary acts. This will definitely pave the way for Mary J Blige, Alicia Keys, TLC etc.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...