ThatOtherFan Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 So it's a lie? Yeah, but most of the time you are arguing it doesn't take but about 3-5 responses. You end up with 20+. I will say that sometimes it's due to someone shading you, but you keep it going with your trademark nonsense sometimes. I made a true statement. Sue me. You make it seem like you're threatening to. You always bring up the bro/sis card even when I defend you I DON'T constantly shade you. In fact, I defend you ... when necessary. No, it's #TrueTea Yeah, usually someone starts in with the shade, so the nature of the conversation changes, but I NEVER start random arguments with anyone and you know this. You shaded me with baseless and factually incorrect tea. *calls my lawyers* I never threatened to disown you. I bring up the bro/sis card because you almost never defend me! Only recently have you been defending me more (and I appreciate it ), but before then you would always defend the other person, even if they started it with me!! :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 But its funny how your "strong opinion" about something comes at a convenient time for you to debate endlessly to get ur post count up. No, that's just how you interpret/try to portray it. Just because you think that doesn't mean that's what I'm doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 No, that's just how you interpret/try to portray it. Just because you think that doesn't mean that's what I'm doing. The evidence is there Shemar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 The evidence is there Shemar. There is no "evidence" only your lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 #1 Yup..your presence. #2 You have gone back and forth with art before MAINLY over MJ. Remember Game and art think you MJ stans are a lil "wacky" and you all dont take that face down. You have definately had words with art. #1 #2 That was months ago But even then, it wasn't that often with her. Could probably count those arguments on one hand as well, just like with Selz(of course for different reasons) No, it's #TrueTea Yeah, usually someone starts in with the shade, so the nature of the conversation changes, but I NEVER start random arguments with anyone and you know this. You shaded me with baseless and factually incorrect tea. *calls my lawyers* I never threatened to disown you. I bring up the bro/sis card because you almost never defend me! Only recently have you been defending me more (and I appreciate it ), but before then you would always defend the other person, even if they started it with me!! :cry: I am getting no fresh Lipton from your statement. Yes, you do. You either start it or prolong it more than what was required. You are a habitual liar, you have falsely accused me time and time again of creating nonexisting evidence and you WILL be sued blind. *calls Tom Mesereau and David Walgren* You act like it. Being neutral isn't the same as defending, love. Plus, us being bro/sis has nothing to do with the argument itself. Fallacy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 There is no "evidence" only lies. The Shemar comparisons certainly are. I agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 #1 #2 That was months ago But even then, it wasn't that often with her. Could probably count those arguments on one hand as well, just like with Selz(of course for different reasons) #1 ... #2 but the fact that it was multiple arguments with mutiple members have contributed to that post count is my point,dear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 #1 ... #2 but the fact that it was multiple arguments with mutiple members have contributed to that post count is my point,dear. #1 I meant " " Idk, wtf happened there #2 The couple arguments with Selz and the few with Art COMBINED barely put a dent in my count. I don't think I've spent even a full 200-400 with either of them Now if you brought up Game and the Nutcase then you have a solid argument here. But still, that's only two people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 I am getting no fresh Lipton from your statement. Yes, you do. You either start it or prolong it more than what was required. You are a habitual liar, you have falsely accused me time and time again of creating nonexisting evidence and you WILL be sued blind. *calls Tom Mesereau and David Walgren* You act like it. Being neutral isn't the same as defending, love. Plus, us being bro/sis has nothing to do with the argument itself. Fallacy I serve only the freshest lipton, so obviously the issue you are having is yours and yours alone. I NEVER start arguments or prolong arguments!!! You and this factually incorrect tea...I simply REFUSE!!! Now I'm a habitual liar, sis!?! I have accused you time and time again of not defending me, and that's because you don't!!! You can't hire Tom or David..they're already on my team. :excited: You are only "neutral" when you know for a fact that I didn't start it. If you think I stat it, you IMMEDIATELY defend the other person. That's not being "neutral", sis. Being bro/sis has everything to do with this...you're supposed to stick up for family before anyone else. :cry: The Shemar comparisons certainly are. I agree with you. I've never stated that I look like Shemar, so again your "evidence" is flawed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 #1 I meant " " Idk, wtf happened there #2 The couple arguments with Selz and the few with Art COMBINED barely put a dent in my count. I don't think I've spent even a full 200-400 with either of them Now if you brought up Game and the Nutcase then you have a solid argument here. But still, that's only two people #1. I won this one. #2 The TOTAL of all arguments have helped..thats the point. How much you did with each is irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 I serve only the freshest lipton, so obviously the issue you are having is yours and yours alone. I NEVER start arguments or prolong arguments!!! You and this factually incorrect tea...I simply REFUSE!!! Now I'm a habitual liar, sis!?! I have accused you time and time again of not defending me, and that's because you don't!!! You can't hire Tom or David..they're already on my team. :excited: You are only "neutral" when you know for a fact that I didn't start it. If you think I stat it, you IMMEDIATELY defend the other person. That's not being "neutral", sis. Being bro/sis has everything to do with this...you're supposed to stick up for family before anyone else. :cry: Honey, people call me Alice 'cause I always know what's the tea. I get no Lipton, no Nestea, no Luzianne, no Lancashire, no Tetley, no Fortnum$Mason, no nada-at all in that statement. Yes, you do, and we clocked this tea forever again. You're late, you're late, and you can't help but hate. Been that way, bro. YES.I.DO. When necessary, like I said. Most of the time, I stay on neutral ground. I called them, they're with me. Tough luck, dearie. No. When you didn't start it, I defend you. When you do start it, I defend them. Otherwise, I leave it alone and maybe instigate a little It has NOTHING to do with this. I stand for what's right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 #1. I won this one. #2 The TOTAL of all arguments have helped..thats the point. How much you did with each is irrelevant. #1 Oh shut up. #2 Even if the arguments were gone, I'd be in the Top 20 still. So it isn't THAT much of a factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 #2 Even if the arguments were gone, I'd be in the Top 20 still. So it isn't THAT much of a factor. #2 nice move to try to switch it up...but its safe to say I won this one too. 2 for 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 #2 nice move to try to switch it up...but its safe to say I won this one too. 2 for 2. And how is that, love? Arguments or not, I'm still a major factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 And how is that, love? Arguments or not, I'm still a major factor. no one said you weren't..stay on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 no one said you weren't..stay on topic. Already there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Honey, people call me Alice 'cause I always know what's the tea. I get no Lipton, no Nestea, no Luzianne, no Lancashire, no Tetley, no Fortnum$Mason, no nada-at all in that statement. Yes, you do, and we clocked this tea forever again. You're late, you're late, and you can't help but hate. That was SOOOOO much more than what was required!!! :lmao: :lmao: Been that way, bro. YES.I.DO. When necessary, like I said. Most of the time, I stay on neutral ground. I called them, they're with me. Tough luck, dearie. I don't have anything to lie about, sis! Most of the time you defend everyone else but me! :cry: :cry: They agreed to be apart of my team first. I'm sorry...you lose, as always. No. When you didn't start it, I defend you. When you do start it, I defend them. Otherwise, I leave it alone and maybe instigate a little It has NOTHING to do with this. I stand for what's right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 That was SOOOOO much more than what was required!!! :lmao: :lmao: I don't have anything to lie about, sis! Most of the time you defend everyone else but me! :cry: :cry: They agreed to be apart of my team first. I'm sorry...you lose, as always. It was exactly what was required. :lmao: And yet... That is NOT true They did no such thing. You said lawyers, and there was no implication as to who. Again, I win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.