Jump to content

FreelovesJJ

Members
  • Posts

    1,220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by FreelovesJJ

  1. In 2011, there was the UCAP tour the most of the tweets says it was 57 tweets...think about that. When I clicked on the data the biggest amount was 7, 7 tweets you're calling active. Then in 2009, she had 44 tweets for the YEAR. Are seeing how ridiculous this is? Thats 2 tweets a month at best & most of it would be promo, but she didn't even tweet that often...that was right around RWU tour. She was never, really active on social media. Ya'll have to stop. Well, if you claim she was more active during tours - then she was not, then that would be called difference. I remember the entire time you being the person who continued to vilify the situation because of him being Islamic. We have seen pictures of Janet out and about buying flowers...in the baby shop...we've seen her. By herself and with others. She wasn't a prisoner. She hasn't said anything, everything is speculation.
  2. She was trying something new. It didn't work. Now she's trying something new. Hopefully it works. Giving us that message from the studio & not being seen. She was trying to live in mystique & instead of doing it right...it kinda didn't help her. It has nothing to do with Wissam - she dated him during UCAP.
  3. the great thing about Twitter is you can google and find this out. She was always nearly non-existent on Twitter. I'm sure any other fan can vouch.
  4. Never. Literally, never. Her Twitter was nearly nonexistent before Unbreakable. She used twitter ONLY to post promo UNICEF stuff, charity stuff, music sometimes. She has never regularly or even seasonally used twitter. I know because I didn't really follow her because it was so quiet.
  5. Tell me which website she was active on before Wissam, not including JD's vlog?
  6. Y'all do remember Janet before Wissam right? When she was ducking paps, going through back doors to avoid crowds, never using social media, disappearing from public eye... It feels like, JD made y'all think Janet loved the spotlight. She has NEVER been a very public person. This is strictly playing into the fact that so many "fans" were frustrated with her privacy & wanting to hear from her.
  7. Wooooooow!!!! I knew this was coming soon! Who got this pic & where did it come from?!!! He doesn't have a look yet to me....this is crazy! I love it! Well maybe more like his dad!
  8. I'm not saying that would be her motive but she like J.Lo doesn't have to tour or make music ever again and she would be good. Quick money doesn't mean pay bills.
  9. whether we agree or disagree that's my belief about all of this. I can think of a dozen ways Janet could have done a lot of things differently and better but she chose other means.
  10. With the exception of Vegas - she already has. So best she retire now?
  11. Maybe if she sells some point of the story she can get some sympathy buys. But some fans can't make it to Vegas & im going to say this & I mean no disrespect to fans but the truth is - the people doing the business wants return more than they want fan satisfaction. Some fans travel states to see her. Those fans will make it & see multiple shows. Then some new ppl who never saw her or wouldn't have bought a ticket will buy one because they're in Vegas & she's performing. Plus they get to see a Jackson. Now if she just drops a world tour after just having a son & GOD forbid something as normal as a cold or sick child happens - which is it easier to "cancel/postpone" a world tour? Or a residency? The residency can have a doctor there in the hotel & she performs the next day twice or later that night but a world tour you get that venue at availability. Ijs - for her life & brand right now a residency makes the most sense.
  12. Oh God this emotional response is draining. The point of rebranding is because people like yourself are so frustrated that the average persons are not buying tickets to make up for the expenses of coming out there. Being inconsistent whether purposefully or not costs. I'm not saying what's fair or just. I'm saying what's true. You do not owe Janet & she does not owe you. You're giving ultimatums and asking why she needs to go back to the drawing board? You sound like someone who is going into an arena after snapping on her to cheer her on - MOST people are not that invested. They would move on & think nothing of it. You being a die hard fan who cares enough to create an account on a fan forum is different from someone who knows her hit singles & gossip. Yes, Janet would be able to sell Vegas. I don't care how you slice it. People would go see her. I'm not saying fans can continue to wait - I'm saying most common "fans" don't give a shit enough to wait or insist. And the conversation about giving you your money back, feels weird to us who were able to get our money back right away because we bought from Ticketmaster or the promoters directly.
  13. I just said Chris Brown, Big Sean, Future, J.Lo are doing rotating residencies out there. The has been concept is old & dead now. It's a new era. It's very old school to think only old acts are in Vegas. Vegas is becoming a commodity for quick money.
  14. They didn't plan to "split" I believe they are not "split" up at all. If they were, and didn't plan on getting a divorce, we wouldn't know about it just like we didn't know anything about her marriage & other things. Janet is the queen of secrecy. She's not divorced so there would not have been any public document of it. Right after they announce she's all out? Don't forget those pictures where she was out looking at flowers, and out walking around by herself. But they're making it like she couldn't leave the house. This was very purposeful. Now a potential tour leaks. Janet knows, "she's been listening", her last strategy of being out of the public eye - quiet & mysterious didn't work. She knows her fans wanted to see her & hear from her. So she has to become more engaging. I'm not buying it, if divorce is filed (which I hope not) then I'll retract my statements.
  15. I hear your frustrations but let's talk from a business angle. You are thinking from a fan angle. Janet might can go out to Europe & complete her half of the tour there but overall it's a numbers game. And all that frustration you're talking about is larger than the core amount of fans that will sell out an arena. Fans have to remember this is business & they are consumers. Janet is selling a product. She has UNINTENTIONALLY upset her market because of uncontrollable factors - or bad strategy. She 100% cannot relaunch the Unbreakable tour so it would have to be a different production that would take marketing money & branding money to resolidify her brand & make her TRUSTWORTHY to ticket buyers. Going to Vegas, she skips that. Vegas is designed for her to do well. Cher, is 70 years old & still selling out Vegas. Chris Brown, Big Sean, J.Lo, Backstreet Boys, Mariah, Britney's Spear are all in Vegas & do residencies there. People go there with the intent to see shows & spend money. Janet doesn't need to do all that work of rebranding & promotion because in Vegas it's already done for you. It's unfortunate that she has missed out on touch all over the world but IMO - it would be smarter to wait until she rebuilds her tour image & do that down the line. Not to mention, you skipped her most recent tour before Unbreakable - UCAP she not only fulfilled she increased the dates.
  16. We'll see how it plays out. I think Live Nation wants a return on their money & to be honest with you Janet does not have a good tour reputation right now. I think to come out with a tour soon wouldn't fair too well with some people. I don't know if it will give her the numbers she needs to pack out the house.
  17. I will keep saying it every time it's brought to me. I believe this "split" is for publicity for her return. Wissam will get Eissa at times as they are "raising the child together" don't forget. There has been no divorce as of yet.
  18. The best damage control would be for her to do a Vegas residency. They will provide all the bells and whistles. Her & Eissa can be stabilized with somewhere to live, all she would have to do is go downstairs and work. She would get enough breaks and all. She doesn't have to travel the world & get people to buy tickets. She doesn't need to worry about 3rd party ticket sales giving her a bad name. She can do some minor press - print - discussing being back, "slimming" down, motherhood at 50, not divorcing but taking some time, & liberation. A residency is the best way to combat the trust she's lost with touring.
  19. What if all that's going on is the precursor for this. Idk if this is true but if you haven't figured out what's going on is all about publicity then you're behind.
  20. without a doubt this whole damn thing is publicity
  21. I think reading into him finding peace in this moment through his faith is petty and shady. Nonetheless, I also think they for whatever reason are being very public by something they both could have been very private. We only know because Janet's or their collective camp released it. As of now remember there is no divorce filed. The moving boxes the trip to the park pointing at the sky. The balloons and toys, all things that would have gone under the radar IF the intent was to be under the radar.
  22. thank you!! You guys are dope! I can't wait to see him, I think it's coming soon.
  23. that's what I looked up, can someone zoom on the arm or hand. It looks like Janet to me. I'd love to see
  24. I was trying to make that out, but I could only see Janet's hands.
×
×
  • Create New...