Escapade Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I doubt he was 5 though Lol of course not! He's 16. He has tough skin though, but then again he is an attention whore just like 78% of the rest of the students there. I remember being 12 in middle school and some girl cam to school wearing boy clothes and everyone pissed their pants. Everyone who went to her elementary school said she's been wearing boy clothes since she was little. In middle school she denied being gay but in now in high school she is very open about it... probably because a vast majority of the girls are gay, bi..... or pregnant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Baby Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Lol of course not! He's 16. He has tough skin though, but then again he is an attention whore just like 78% of the rest of the students there. I remember being 12 in middle school and some girl cam to school wearing boy clothes and everyone pissed their pants. Everyone who went to her elementary school said she's been wearing boy clothes since she was little. In middle school she denied being gay but in now in high school she is very open about it... probably because a vast majority of the girls are gay, bi..... or pregnant But at least she was able to at least find most of who she was...at 5,,,this boy is not. jweezy...your turn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Exactly that, women wearing shorts/pants is not a farfetched approach to changing societal standards. A man wearing a dress is an unconventional approach to changing society. It will never work. That's going overboard and you know it. Can you really sit here and say a boy wearing a dress wont have an effect on him in his later years? Think about how cruel children can be at school. Think about how ppl view men wearing dresses. Can you really say there isn't a problem? That is the point sweetie...at some point that was a "farfetched approach". You used the example of women at some point not being able to have clothing that even exposed their ankles... So, at some point, a woman or a group of women were more than likely HARSHLY persecuted for going against that society standard. Their persecution and it's aftermath created the pathway that lead to where we are now...with women wearing pants, shorts, and basically what ever else she wants fashion wise. It's not "unconventional" now because someone, somewhere created that path toward change...the same can be said here. I don't know the future of this child...if he's just in essence a "tomgirl" (for lack of a better expression). Is this just a phase, like some girls that go through a "tomboy" phase, only to develop into a "regular" straight female in her adult life, or is this something that will play a more profound role in his life...The point is the only difference between the two scenarios "tomboy" and "tomgirl" is what's "acceptable" in society...and AGAIN if someone, somewhere isn't bold to go against society standards...that pathway to change can never occur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
switchblade330 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 i prefer no clothes at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 i prefer no clothes at all I always find that to be best. :lol: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.