He just likes to do it in a dress. Big deal."

[henrietta.]

he keeps telling me how he wants to get with the person in that pic

He's old and senile, looks like a Nick Jr. cartoon character, has the personality of a Disney cartoon character, dick doesn't work and now his walls are extinct...what else can he reveal to use that will be shocking

[ThatOtherFan]

I just saw it. Now you see why I keep blocking him

but I'm talkin 2 you

*finishes watching mean girls and harassing joe

*blocks you*

Can we do that to mods? lol

he keeps telling me how he wants to get with the person in that pic

No I'm not...YOU want to get with him and give up your loose booty to hi,

You already said a dude put the booty on your and you can't hold it. Time is valuable, and I don't want to lose seconds off my life while you struggle to contain yourself

This thread already proves that you're senile. Better invest in them denim Huggies

<insert that Peter Griffin guilty clip>

Ok *vogues to Christina's "Not Myself Tonight"*

I NEVER SAID THAT...once and for all...if memory serves, I said when I'm with someone, in a relationship, we have multiple sessions in one night. As in, do it, cum, rest for a minute, and do it all over again (I'm a bit of a nympho lol ) From that you SOMEHOW cam to the conclusion that I'm a minute man.

This thread doesn't prove anything about me.

You would vogue to something wack like NMT Chop.

[henrietta.]

I NEVER SAID THAT...once and for all...if memory serves, I said when I'm with someone, in a relationship, we have multiple sessions in one night. As in, do it, cum, rest for a minute, and do it all over again (I'm a bit of a nympho lol ) From that you SOMEHOW cam to the conclusion that I'm a minute man.

This thread doesn't prove anything about me.

You would vogue to something wack like NMT Chop.

<insert Roc's gurl please video clip> If you think that's what you said, then your memory is truly shot Was that the night you pretended to be drunk? It all makes sense now...he put it on you, you quickly nutted, he asked what's wrong with your dick and you used the "I'm drunk" excuse You truly are old....senile and got a broke dick. I just can't with you...I truly can't

Oh it does....it does

The last couple of seconds to that song > your videos

[King Baby]

And society DOSEN'T matter, because society dosen't pay their bills, or help them in any way. You stay in your little Elizabeth Hasslebeck world.

Girl get real...You too old for this candyland bullshit.

if society didn't matter then there wouldn't be so many people fighting to change it.

If society didn't matter we wouldn't still be fighting against gay suicide, don't ask don't tell, discrimation, etc.

Society matters a lot, and it will chew you up and spit you out, and when people like Lady Gaga and countless others get out and fight it is cool, but all a 5 year old should be doing is being a 5 year old. Thats all I'm saying.

When he gets 15 let him wear a dress, but child development comes before your little sexy gay rights movement.

[Jodienda76]

Girl get real...You too old for this candyland bullshit.

if society didn't matter then there wouldn't be so many people fighting to change it.

If society didn't matter we wouldn't still be fighting against gay suicide, don't ask don't tell, discrimation, etc.

Society matters a lot, and it will chew you up and spit you out, and when people like Lady Gaga and countless others get out and fight it is cool, but all a 5 year old should be doing is being a 5 year old. Thats all I'm saying.

When he gets 15 let him wear a dress, but child development comes before your little sexy gay rights movement.

No honey...Society ideologies only matter to weak people like yourself.

[King Baby]

No honey...Society ideologies only matter to weak people like yourself.

Don't mistake strength with foolishness or weakness with common sense.

And the lack of common sense and good decision making obvious eludes your dumb ass completely...

You don't change society by making stupid decisions and a fool of yourself and sacrificing a 5 year old's sanity in the process. You change it by choosing you battles wisely.

And I'm done on that subject...Ya'll send ya'll boys to school in a dress and parade them all over the internet at 5 if ya'll want but just don't be mad when they confused, abused and fucked up in the head later in life...

Cause its worth it right?

[Mr. Wonder]

*goes to read last 5 pages*

[Mr. Wonder]

Fail. Nudity is a "crime,"

Wait a minute now....

Awwwww J.Weezy is smart too.

I've taught him well.

And considering you are effeminate (or at least you portray yourself that way) it's kind of hypocritical for you to say what you're saying.

This is an ad hominem attack.

You made another ad hominem attack And we all know what happens when your argument contains fallacies.

[ThatOtherFan]

I've taught him well.

He learned everything he knows about forum posting from me...bitch

[Mr. Wonder]

Problem with your eyes Lajerk?

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

[Mr. Wonder]

As I'm reading the thread (on page 10 now), Nuk is actually shitting on ya'll's arguments. Everything he is saying is true.

It's clear some of you have never take a course in Psychology and/or Child Development.

[ThatOtherFan]

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

It's not that funny

In fact it's not funny at all

As I'm reading the thread (on page 10 now), Nuk is actually shitting on ya'll's arguments. Everything he is saying is true.

It's clear some of you have never take a course in Psychology and/or Child Development.

You would side with Nuk on this issue.

...and Nuk got dragged by Jodi and Jweezy on this topic, not the other way around.

[Mr. Wonder]

It's not that funny

In fact it's not funny at all

You would side with Nuk on this issue.

...and Nuk got dragged by Jodi and Jweezy on this topic, not the other way around.

It was VERY funny. I spit up on my computer when I saw it. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Ummm, no Nuk read BOTH of them DOWNE!!! Everything Nuk said was absolutely correct. J Weezy made some good points, but his arguments contained a number of fallacies, but overall Nuk was the victor. And Jodi, well she's just an idiot (the Sarah Palin of the board), so I don't even know why she came in here thinking her, or her opinion mattered.

+1 for Nuk. He was correct in everything he said, and had better and more sound arguments.

[ThatOtherFan]

It was VERY funny. I spit up on my computer when I saw it. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Ummm, no Nuk read BOTH of them DOWNE!!! Everything Nuk said was absolutely correct. J Weezy made some good points, but his arguments contained a number of fallacies, but overall Nuk was the victor. And Jodi, well she's just an idiot (the Sarah Palin of the board), so I don't even know why she came in here thinking her, or her opinion mattered.

+1 for Nuk. He was correct in everything he said, and had better and more sound arguments.

Why did you spit on your computer? You nasty bitch...

Bullshit..everything Jodi and Jweezy said was right. How will there ever be change if someone somewhere isn't bold enough to stand up and say this shit ain't right?

The parents in this situation aren't doing a single thing wrong...it's clothes for goodness sake.

It's no different than a girl being a "tomboy" and not wanting her hair done, doesn't wear dresses, and plays with the boys...there is NO difference here. He may very well grow up to be a straight male, just as many tomboys grow up to be "regular" straight females. The issue here is social constructs... and this family allowing their son to go against the grain in a way that ruffles feathers, because of our society's views on masculinity.

There are MILLIONS of little girls on the opposite end of this spectrum, but no one makes a fuss because again of social constructs and the views people have about masculinity and femininity.

I'm surprised you don't get it Austineisha

[Mr. Wonder]

Why did you spit on your computer? You nasty bitch...

Bullshit..everything Jodi and Jweezy said was right. How will there ever be change if someone somewhere isn't bold enough to stand up and say this shit ain't right?

The parents in this situation aren't doing a single thing wrong...it's clothes for goodness sake.

It's no different than a girl being a "tomboy" and not wanting her hair done, doesn't wear dresses, and plays with the boys...there is NO difference here. He may very well grow up to be a straight male. The issue here issue here is social constructs... and this family allowing their son to go against the grain in a way that ruffles feathers, because of our society's view on masculinity.

There are MILLIONS of little girls on the opposite end of this spectrum, but no one makes a fuss because again of social constructs and the views people have about masculinity and femininity.

I'm surprised you don't get it Austineisha

Because it was just that funny. And I'll laugh some more later on too.

DEATH @ him going up against society like it's going to change 400+ years worth of structure. American societal standards didn't come to fruition overnight. It took well over 400 years of influence, shaping, and evolution to get where societal standards are today. You may think that him putting on a dress now doesn't have an affect on him now, but the American Psychological Association would definitely disagree. Please don't make me pull out my Psych book and school you girls.

[Mr. Wonder]

Problem with your eyes Lajerk?

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

[ThatOtherFan]

Because it was just that funny. And I'll laugh some more later on too.

DEATH @ him going up against society like it's going to change 400+ years worth of structure. American societal standards didn't come to fruition overnight. It took well over 400 years of influence, shaping, and evolution to get where societal standards are today. You may think that him putting on a dress now doesn't have an affect on him now, but the American Psychological Association would definitely disagree. Please don't make me pull out my Psych book and school you girls.

It being "funny" (which is debatable ) has nothing to do with you randomly spitting on your PC...nasty bitch

Again...if someone somewhere doesn't take a stand, change never happens.

A few hundred years ago...it was okay and a society standard for certain individuals to own people like you and I. Hell people used the damn bible to justify it...sound familiar concerning another pressing matter that effects you and I?

It was okay and a society standard for people like you and I to have NO RIGHTS whatsoever.

It was okay and a society standard for people like you and I to be second class citizens...if we even ranked that high on the totem pole.

I could go on and on and encompass MANY other issues that were a society standard that have THANKFULLY changed...again if that one person, group of people, etc doesn't stand up and say this shit ain't right...change never takes place.

And again, this situation is NO DIFFERENT than the MILLIONS of girls who we refer to as "tomboys" who prefer to wear boys clothes growing up, don't want to wear dresses, prefer to hang with boys, and essentially don't want to be associated with anything feminine. Now, yes quite a few of these girls are infact Lesbian...but there are just as many who grow up to be "regular" straight females. This is okay, in our society, but the minute a parent allows a boy to express himself in the opposite manner it's a "big deal"

This kinda ties into my "Can a guy be bisexual" thread...there are different rules in our society for boys and girls, masculine and feminine, and what's "acceptable"...

[ThatOtherFan]

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

[Mr. Wonder]

It being "funny" (which is debatable ) has nothing to do with you randomly spitting on your PC...nasty bitch

Again...if someone somewhere doesn't take a stand, change never happens.

A few hundred years ago...it was okay and a society standard for certain individuals to own people like you and I. Hell people used the damn bible to justify it...sound familiar concerning another pressing matter that effects you and I?

It was okay and a society standard for people like you and I to have NO RIGHTS whatsoever.

It was okay and a society standard for people like you and I to be second class citizens...if we even ranked that high on the totem pole.

I could go on and on and encompass MANY other issues that were a society standard that have THANKFULLY changed...again if that one person, group of people, etc doesn't stand up and say this shit ain't right...change never takes place.

And again, this situation is NO DIFFERENT than the MILLIONS of girls who we refer to as "tomboys" who prefer to wear boys clothes growing up, don't want to wear dresses, prefer to hang with boys, and essentially don't want to be associated with anything feminine. Now, yes quite a few of these girls are infact Lesbian...but there are just as many who grow up to be "regular" straight females. This is okay, in our society, but the minute a parent allows a boy to express himself in the opposite manner it's a "big deal"

This kinda ties into my "Can a guy be bisexual" thread...there are different rules in our society for boys and girls, masculine and feminine, and what's "acceptable"...

Like Nuk said, you don't go about changing society by nonconventional means. Going far left field or being radical is not going to get you far. You used slavery as an example. Okay, Harriet Tubman didn't change the face of slavery by escorting slaves to the north. Nat Turner didn't change the face of slavery by revolting. Those are nonconventional means of change. What worked? LEGISLATION, a conventional means of change. Let's look at the gays. Why do you think feminine gay men are more marginalized by mainstream America, than 'regular acting' gay men? The queen is nonconventional, the 'regular gay' is more accepting by society because he/she is conventional. You don't go about changing societal standards with the most farfetched approach. That doesn't work. Hence why nobody was here for Malcolm X, but rather MLK Jr.

In America, you put a 5 year old outside in a dress, he is going to be marginalized. He will be teased. He will be harassed at school (4th graders can be some mean bitches ). Society will ostracize him. That teasing will be suppressed through the teenage and young adult years, and will resurface during their 30s, which is when? When most adults have their mid-life crisis. A mid-life crisis is nothing more than a resurfacing of suppressed memories from childhood. I can't remember the exact concept, but psychologists have all stated that childhood years are the MOST important stages of development for a human being. It is the foundation of life, values, morals, etc. Everything you know is taught during this stage.

Sure you don't think a child at 5 doesn't know what he is doing by putting on a dress, but in years he will. Everything Nuk said was dead on point. Also, gender roles are not always man made fyi.

[King Baby]

@Doom at a 5 year old taking a stand!!

Ya'll bitches have lost ya'll minds!

They want this boy to be the great gay savior at 5 years old, so he can be a suicidal sociopath by 11...

...and they act like scoiety doesn't matter. Get in the real world. Its a word for people who can't fucntion in society!

S: (n) sociopath, psychopath (someone with a sociopathic personality; a person with an antisocial personality disorder (`psychopath' was once widely used but has now been superseded by `sociopath'))

[King Baby]

Like Nuk said, you don't go about changing society by nonconventional means. Going far left field or being radical is not going to get you far. You used slavery as an example. Okay, Harriet Tubman didn't change the face of slavery by escorting slaves to the north. Nat Turner didn't change the face of slavery by revolting. Those are nonconventional means of change. What worked? LEGISLATION, a conventional means of change. Let's look at the gays. Why do you think feminine gay men are more marginalized by mainstream America, than 'regular acting' gay men? The queen is nonconventional, the 'regular gay' is more accepting by society because he/she is conventional. You don't go about changing societal standards with the most farfetched approach. That doesn't work. Hence why nobody was here for Malcolm X, but rather MLK Jr.

In America, you put a 5 year old outside in a dress, he is going to be marginalized. He will be teased. He will be harassed at school (4th graders can be some mean bitches ). Society will ostracize him. That teasing will be suppressed through the teenage and young adult years, and will resurface during their 30s, which is when? When most adults have their mid-life crisis. A mid-life crisis is nothing more than a resurfacing of suppressed memories from childhood. I can't remember the exact concept, but psychologists have all stated that childhood years are the MOST important stages of development for a human being. It is the foundation of life, values, morals, etc. Everything you know is taught during this stage.

Sure you don't think a child at 5 doesn't know what he is doing by putting on a dress, but in years he will. Everything Nuk said was dead on point. Also, gender roles are not always man made fyi.

School them!!!

These girls are living on the other side of the rainbow!!

I hope his mother makes a lot of money off that book because she gonna have to use it all to have him home schooled.

A boy in a dress is not just gonna have the kids teasing him, the teachers will have a problem, the principal will, and I'm sure the other kids parents aren't gonna be too happy with it either. All before he is 8 years old.

He gonna be a psycho serial killer in a dress eating people's hearts and I hope he get the people pretending its cool right now.

Its way too much to put on a 5 year old, now if it were a 15 year old they are mentally developed but hunnies 5? NO!

[King Baby]

Why did you spit on your computer? You nasty bitch...

Bullshit..everything Jodi and Jweezy said was right. How will there ever be change if someone somewhere isn't bold enough to stand up and say this shit ain't right?

The parents in this situation aren't doing a single thing wrong...it's clothes for goodness sake.

It's no different than a girl being a "tomboy" and not wanting her hair done, doesn't wear dresses, and plays with the boys...there is NO difference here. He may very well grow up to be a straight male, just as many tomboys grow up to be "regular" straight females. The issue here is social constructs... and this family allowing their son to go against the grain in a way that ruffles feathers, because of our society's views on masculinity.

There are MILLIONS of little girls on the opposite end of this spectrum, but no one makes a fuss because again of social constructs and the views people have about masculinity and femininity.

I'm surprised you don't get it Austineisha

Whether he is gay or not is not hardly the problem with this situation...

The problem will be who will he kill first himself or you!

[ThatOtherFan]

Like Nuk said, you don't go about changing society by nonconventional means. Going far left field or being radical is not going to get you far. You used slavery as an example. Okay, Harriet Tubman didn't change the face of slavery by escorting slaves to the north. Nat Turner didn't change the face of slavery by revolting. Those are nonconventional means of change. What worked? LEGISLATION. Let's look at the gays. Why do you think feminine gay men are more marginalized by mainstream America, than 'regular acting' gay? The queen is nonconventional, the 'regular gay' is more accepting by society because he/she is conventional. You don't go about changing societal standards with the most farfetched approach. That doesn't work. Hence why nobody was here for Malcolm X, but rather MLK Jr.

In America, you put a 5 year old outside in a dress, he is going to be marginalized. He will be teased. He will be harassed at school (4th graders can be some mean bitches ). Society will ostracize him. That teasing will be suppressed through the teenage and young adult years, and will resurface during their 30s, which is when? When most adults have their mid-life crisis. A mid-life crisis is nothing more than a resurfacing of suppressed memories from childhood. I can't remember the exact concept, but psychologists have all stated that childhood years are the MOST important stages of development for a human being. It is the foundation of life, values, morals, etc. Everything you know is taught during this stage.

Sure you don't think a child at 5 doesn't know what he is doing by putting on a dress, but in years he will. Everything Nuk said was dead on point. Also, gender roles are not always man made fyi.

It has to start somewhere...legislation doesn't usually happen until the people in power see enough people support it, and/or feel they're jobs aren't jeopardy in the next elections if they support or campaign for it(i.e politics).

Like I said before, change doesn't start until someone, somewhere stands up and say this shit ain't right.

There are the people you named and THOUSANDS, perhaps MILLIONS of others unknown individuals who stood up, and or were the first to take a stand and lost their life or were persecuted tremendously for going against what society says is "right". It has to start somewhere and with someone...that's always the root of change and how it starts.

If those people hadn't been the first to take a stand, before the legislation was passed, in essence those things I brought up could STILL be in place for people like you and I. It has to START SOMEWHERE.

..and again feminine gays are marginalized again because of what I said before on THIS very topic. Because of society's views about masculine and femininity. Again, going back to my "can a guy be bisexual" thread...gay men, bisexual men, or someone who even admits to experimenting in the past are AUTOMATICALLY seen as weak, no matter if we're "straight-acting" or feminine...we're seen as emasculated individuals because of who we're attracted to.

Again what is the difference between this boy wanting to wear a dress and a girl being a tomboy? Nothing... Except social constructs...over time we've have accepted that girls go through this phase and usually grow out it to become what society perceives as "normal" females.

Yes, we know how society will treat this boy...but that's the WHOLE POINT of the argument. If someone, somewhere doesn't take a stand...change can't take place.

[Xtraordinary Xternal]

I can't believe yall still debating this... Its wrong for a little boy to be in a dress period. For one it would be a distraction in school for his peers and then for him because u know they will bully him. This is what happens when parents want to be bestfriends with their children and not actual parents. Do some of yall work??? For the men go to work in a pink dress and act like its ok? Ladies go to work topless and see what happens...

[Mr. Wonder]

School them!!!

These girls are living on the other side of the rainbow!!

I hope his mother makes a lot of money off that book because she gonna have to use it all to have him home schooled.

A boy in a dress is not just gonna have the kids teasing him, the teachers will have a problem, the principal will, and I'm sure the other kids parents aren't gonna be too happy with it either. All before he is 8 years old.

He gonna be a psycho serial killer in a dress eating people's hearts and I hope he get the people pretending its cool right now.

Its way too much to put on a 5 year old, now if it were a 15 year old they are mentally developed but hunnies 5? NO!

It was such a ki to see Jodi saying society doesn't matter especially considering the fact that WE RAISE OUR CHILDREN BASED ON SOCIETAL STANDARDS - say please and thank you, respect your elders, treat women with respect, don't steal, etc. Dat bish is just stupid to say society doesn't matter.

I can't really word it, but America needs lines of differentiation. There's men's clothing, there's women's clothing. There's a reason why we have to separate them. The cuts are different. The sizing is different. Some clothes just aren't meant for certain sexes (bras, thongs, boxer briefs, etc). We need these lines of distinction. Clothes are clothes yes, but America isn't at the point where it's okay for sexes to intermix clothing. You see how far it has taken for Americans to not be shocked when a woman says she's the breadwinner for the family, or both parents work 9-5s. America likes slow progress, almost like the Foot in the Door Phenomenon. We already have women wearing men type garments (boy cut shorts for example), and men wearing women type garments (can't think of any ). That's a start. It's going to be QUITE A WHILE before society accepts a man wearing a dress.