King Baby Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 A 96-year-old woman has confessed to the 1946 murder of a prominent businessman whom she mistakenly believed had been a Nazi collaborator during World War II, the AP reports. Though Felix Gulje was acquitted of being a Nazi collaborator, rumors persisted. On March 1, 1946, Atie Visser, who worked for the resistance after Germany occupied the Netherlands, shot Gulje in the chest when he came to the door of his home. Gulje was the head of a construction company and being considered for a high political post. It turned out that Gulje had sheltered some Jews and given money to help hide others. AP writes that "the failure to find the assassin became a point of contention among political parties." Today, the mayor of Leiden stepped forward with the admission by Atie Ridder-Visser, whom he described as "a very old, very frail woman who hears poorly, is disabled and needs help." Last month she met two of Gulje's grandchildren to explain what happened and why. She will not be prosecuted, the mayor said. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/06/dutch-woman-96-confesses-to-mistaken-murder-in-1946/1?csp=obinsite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidfresh832 Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 No if shes that old and decrepit it would be a waste of time and money to prosecute her now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trackboy Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Yes, she does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 I think the courts have a certain amount of time that someone can be charged for a crime. I forget the name of it though. Statute of limitations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Enjoi Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 I think the courts have a certain amount of time that someone can be charged for a crime. I forget the name of it though. Statute Of Limitations. That's why this thread is nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Statute Of Limitations. That's why this thread is nonsense. I just remembered. And it would be stupid to charge a 96 year old woman with a crime. Her pacemaker would buckle under [blood] pressure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Enjoi Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 I just remembered. And it would be stupid to charge a 96 year old woman with a crime. Her pacemaker would buckle under [blood] pressure. Exactly. That's why she came out with it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 I say no, and here is why, the point of the legal system to serve justice and hopefully cause rehab, in this case how can either be done? She 96 as soon as you lock her up she dead, I mean she had to live her whole life with this, I think the same applies to Casey Anthony for the rest of her life folks will give her shit and the side eye. I ask this, what would be gained from trying her, because everyone has a right to a trial, and eventually locking her up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Statute Of Limitations. That's why this thread is nonsense. wait, I am not sure exactly so do not quote me, BUT I do not think there is a statue of limitation to murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Exactly. That's why she came out with it now. Bitch was smart! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Enjoi Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 wait, I am not sure exactly so do not quote me, BUT I do not think there is a statue of limitation to murder. The only real exclusion to this case would be if she committed murder outside of the US. Otherwise, the bitch would be going to jail if she was to be discovered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Bitch was smart! NOPE looked it up: Crimes that are considered exceptionally heinous by society have no statute of limitations. As a rule, there is no statute of limitations for murder, especially capital or first-degree murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Enjoi Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 NOPE looked it up: Crimes that are considered exceptionally heinous by society have no statute of limitations. As a rule, there is no statute of limitations for murder, especially capital or first-degree murder. Hmmmm. Well I guess that's why OJ ain't said shit yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 The only real exclusion to this case would be if she committed murder outside of the US. Otherwise, the bitch would be going to jail if she was to be discovered. see you bring another legal loop hole into the mix I don't know how international law handles these matters, I can say from all the old white men extradited back to Israel to stand trial for war crimes who were found here in the US as former Nazi hunch men , I do not think that matters I think if you were on the wrong side of the law with WWII and the Nazis they roast dat ass no matter what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Hmmmm. Well I guess that's why OJ ain't said shit yet. NO that is not true, you cannot try someone for the same crime twice, double jeopardy, he was already brought to court to face those charges, he could yell at the top of his lungs he did it, so could Casey and nothing could be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Enjoi Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 NO that is not true, you cannot try someone for the same crime twice, double jeopardy, he was already brought to court to face those charges, he could yell at the top of his lungs he did it, so could Casey and nothing could be done. That's right. I keep forgetting he can't be charged again. He might as well run his fucking mouth then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodienda76 Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Yes Casey Anthony should go to jail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrietta. Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 She should sell her story to Lifetime. I would actually watch that movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 NOPE looked it up: Crimes that are considered exceptionally heinous by society have no statute of limitations. As a rule, there is no statute of limitations for murder, especially capital or first-degree murder. But at this point, is it really worth the trial? I mean, the bitch is one AARP benefit away from Judgment Day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 Hell Muthafucking Yes Casey Anthony should go to jail. sometimes you just don't speak up do you Jodi? you hold it all in and just a sweet quiet lil dove Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 She should sell her story to Lifetime. I would actually watch that movie. you like fiction? cause she's a lying ass bitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSimba Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 It would just be impractical. She'll have already spent most of her life free than behind bars either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrietta. Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 you like fiction? cause she's a lying ass bitch This old as woman ain't lying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 I'd say yes but her metal hip may send her out of here when she walks through the metal detector so may as well let nature take it's course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 5, 2011 Share Posted July 5, 2011 That's right. I keep forgetting he can't be charged again. He might as well run his fucking mouth then. In a way he kinda did, I mean he was so arrogant I don't think they woulda came for OJ as hard as they did had he acted like he had some damn sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.