William Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Découvrez en exclusivité demain dans Closer les photos que le monde n’attendait pas : la duchesse de Cambridge topless sur la terrasse d’une maison d’hôte dans le Lubéron ! OMG ! Our future Queen faces embarrassment today after the revealing pictures of her taken as she and Prince William enjoyed a private sunshine holiday this month were printed. Kate and Wills thought they would not be photographed as they stayed at the magnificent Chateau D’Autet in Provence, owned by a nephew of the Queen. But France’s Closer mag obtained images of the pair, now in Malaysia as part of the Diamond Jubilee tour, by the swimming pool – including snaps of Kate, 30, half naked. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/kate-middleton-topless-pictures-printed-1323506 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwistedElegance™ Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 That's disgusting. I thought someone had dug up old pictures of her or something, but this is even worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Somebody gonna get sued? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Posted September 14, 2012 Author Share Posted September 14, 2012 The uncensored cover is out. Kate has nice nips. I hope this doesn't turn out to be Princess Diana all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 I think it's a terrible invasion of privacy. She was sunbathing on a private terrace. Really disrespectful to publish those photos considering her public role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downeaznboi Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 classless. but theres a market for it i guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 The Queen is going to fuck. them. up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 war over boobies... anyways.. who cares... she's a celebrity.. keep your clothes on at all time in public... it's really not that hard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 war over boobies... anyways.. who cares... she's a celebrity.. keep your clothes on at all time in public... it's really not that hard She was on a private terrace though...at least thats what some sources said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 She was on a private terrace though...at least thats what some sources said Janet was on a private yacht... but she didn't step out topless... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Janet was on a private yacht... but she didn't step out topless... She did once upon a time..Her titty pics are all over the net and I don't mean the Superbowl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 She did once upon a time..Her titty pics are all over the net and I don't mean the Superbowl that's fake Janet never said a word about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 that's fake Janet never said a word about it ! If it was her home she would have sued tbh . As for Kate - I admit as she's famous she should know better but I guess it'll blow over . Papz have lenses that can see for a mile, she should know this in her position but that doesn't give them the right to snap away when someone is on private property...does it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 ! If it was her home she would have sued tbh . As for Kate - I admit as she's famous she should know better but I guess it'll blow over . Papz have lenses that can see for a mile, she should know this in her position but that doesn't give them the right to snap away when someone is on private property...does it? No but she shoulda knew better... She knows now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaLpHieReBeL516 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 when will people stop going crazy over dicks & titties?...we all have them, some bigger than others and some smaller than others Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 when will people stop going crazy over dicks & titties?...we all have them, some bigger than others and some smaller than others That's not the issue - it's the "was it an invasion privacy or not" question that's the issue lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 That's not the issue - it's the "was it an invasion privacy or not" question that's the issue lol well of course it is... but as a celebrity... you need to cover yourself up at 98% of the time... unless you want your privates all over the internet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Kate isn't a celebrity. She doesn't court fame. She is a public figure yes. A celebrity no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Kate isn't a celebrity. She doesn't court fame. She is a public figure yes. A celebrity no. A celebrity is a person who has a prominent profile and commands a great degree of public fascination and influence in day-to-day media Kate is a celebrity... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Lawyers for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are pursuing two separate routes in French law: civil and criminal. The civil case is being heard on Monday afternoon by a judge in the Paris suburb of Nanterre. Citing Article 9 of the French Civil Code, lawyers will seek an injunction barring future publication - online or in print - by the magazine Closer of the topless photographs of the duchess. In theory they could also push for existing copies of the magazine to be withdrawn from sales points, but this is most unlikely. At this point in civil proceedings, many French personalities who feel that their right to privacy has been breached also push for financial damages. And normally the judge will order a sum of money to be paid, based on an assessment of the hurt caused. But this, it appears, is not the path chosen by the Royal Family. Instead, lawyers for the duke and duchess are going on the offensive and seeking a conviction in the criminal courts. This is an unusual step in the French system, where most aggrieved parties are content with the damages awarded by the civil courts. In theory, the couple could also seek damages at a later criminal trial. However, it may well be that their aim is to establish a principle, and so have little interest in financial compensation. Their lawyers have now filed their case with the prosecutor's office, citing unnamed individuals or companies as having "deliberately infringed the private life of another". Under Article 226-1 of the French Criminal Code, the punishment for this can go up to a fine of 45,000 euros (£36,400) - or five times that for a company - and a year in jail. Legal experts here say it is an open-and-shut case. Under French law, a criminal (as opposed to a civil) offence is committed if the person photographed was in a "private place" - and that is clearly the case here. The prosecutor's office will now open an investigation, with police mandated to assemble evidence. One legal difficulty may be identifying the photographer, whose name the magazine will probably refuse to release, citing the right to protect its sources. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19625684 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 well of course it is... but as a celebrity... you need to cover yourself up at 98% of the time... unless you want your privates all over the internet there's a even bigger issue though what about all the girls and guys who are young now that get on webcam, do anything to make a quick buck and show the goods, its like you do realize someday someone will say hey isn't that the dude from "biggest cum facial" I think maybe someday it will become second nature to where we don't care because its not that big a deal when so many people have done it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 there's a even bigger issue though what about all the girls and guys who are young now that get on webcam, do anything to make a quick buck and show the goods, its like you do realize someday someone will say hey isn't that the dude from "biggest cum facial" I think maybe someday it will become second nature to where we don't care because its not that big a deal when so many people have done it. who are you referring to? and who uses webcams? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 who are you referring to? and who uses webcams? these dudes that be on porn sites jacking it for money....no different than college girls stripping for tuition Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 these dudes that be on porn sites jacking it for money....no different than college girls stripping for tuition what does that have to do with celebrities those are just regular Americans or wanna be porn stars trying to turn a quick buck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KlaSh-E Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 the only people who care about this are the oldies... People grow up with nudity, sex and porn.... there is no taboo anymore... It's a good thing for kids getting curious, fuck and have babies... cause they're not that curious anymore, but it's bad for the excitement and magic of it, cause that's gone too... I read they wanna throw the people responsible for the pics in jail... What the hell makes them any different from anyone else? If you don't want your tits published, keep them wrapped... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.