XYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 There's nothing fishy about it. It's called a LIE. You don't take a criminal matter to civil court. That alone should have been the red flag. The family had no legal recourse, and they KNEW it, that's why they went to civil court for a settlement. No self-respecting parent would allow their child to be molested by an able-bodied adult, and accept money as restitution/punitive damages. Any REAL parent would want to see the parent behind bars. That's the morality of the situation. thats what i said ur assuming that everyone behaves in a particular manner maybe theyre not self-respecting??? You may even do both...criminal and civil maybe they got legal advice against pursuing criminal matters i really dont know enough about the case what about the fact that MJ settled... theres trouble on his side too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrietta. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Really? Like forreal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 More from that taped conversation: Evan Chandler: "There was no reason why he [Jackson] had to stop calling me...I picked the nastiest son of a bitch I could find [Evan Chandler's lawyer, Barry Rothman], all he wants to do is get this out in the public as fast as he can, as big as he can and humiliate as many people as he can. He's nasty, he's mean, he's smart and he's hungry for publicity. Everything's going to a certain plan that isn't just mine. Once I make that phone call, this guy is going to destroy everybody in sight in any devious, nasty, cruel way that he can do it." TOF his comments are useless to analyse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 Really? Like forreal? YES...like REALLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 reading up on all of it and "spreading the word" Cos folks like you need educating by the looks of things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 And this is one thread I wouldn't mind if TOF did the most. I plan on doing it...if necessary. Okay...in that M. Jordan thread, that "slip" was to get on TOF's nerves after he tried to win brownie points with the other MJ stans/fans and see imaginary MJ shade in one of my posts. Your MJ shade is always an attempt to get on my nerves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrietta. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 YES...like REALLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 And this is one thread I wouldn't mind if TOF did the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrietta. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Your MJ shade is always an attempt to get on my nerves. Umm nope. I've been shading MJ since middle school Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 to me, those comments by the father just sound like someone who is fired up and hell bent on vengeance (and he doesnt realise he is being set up and egged on) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Settling wasnt Michaels idea...it was done under advice. He always said he wanted it to go to trial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 thats what i said ur assuming that everyone behaves in a particular manner maybe theyre not self-respecting??? You may even do both...criminal and civil maybe they got legal advice against pursuing criminal matters i really dont know enough about the case what about the fact that MJ settled... theres trouble on his side too Although everyone's situation is different, your moral compass should kick in and tell you what's right and what's wrong. Allowing your child to be molested at the expense of a comfortable lifestyle is the result of lack of self-respect. It's psychological in the grand scheme of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I'm just saying, there's no substantial proof that MJ is a pedophile. I'm not here for speculation and tampered "evidence". There's tape of Roberta slamming underage puss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 Settling wasnt Michaels idea...it was done under advice. He always said he wanted it to go to trial Then he said things like he just wanted to get it over with and not deal with all the bs. Alot of folks settle just to free themselves of the stress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Although everyone's situation is different, your moral compass should kick in and tell you what's right and what's wrong. Allowing your child to be molested at the expense of a comfortable lifestyle is the result of lack of self-respect. It's psychological in the grand scheme of things. but that point, in itself, is irrelevant to the whole case it doesnt mean indiscretions didnt occur and really, i dunno what was going on in MJ's head he could've pursued new lawyers maybe he was just over it and settled...i dunno but the same objection as to why the parents didnt puruse criminal can be said about MJ's decision to settle... ie.. if ur innocent, u dont settle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 I'm just saying, there's no substantial proof that MJ is a pedophile. I'm not here for speculation and tampered "evidence". There's tape of Roberta slamming underage puss. :filenails: How did he get eventually get off, with that kind of evidence. I didnt follow the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 This topic is so boring now. It'll alway be discussed to death so I'll jut say one thing MJ >>>>> all your lives *continues swaying to 4* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Umm nope. I've been shading MJ since middle school Your shade on here is to get on my nerves. to me, those comments by the father just sound like someone who is fired up and hell bent on vengeance (and he doesnt realise he is being set up and egged on) The first thing in the second portion of the convo I posted was "There was no reason why he [Jackson] had to stop calling me..." THOSE are the words of a father fired up and hell bent on justice for his son against his abuser? Or someone upset because he had been allowed into Michael's life, and now he wouldn't return his calls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 but that point, in itself, is irrelevant to the whole case it doesnt mean indiscretions didnt occur and really, i dunno what was going on in MJ's head he could've pursued new lawyers maybe he was just over it and settled...i dunno but the same objection as to why the parents didnt puruse criminal can be said about MJ's decision to settle... ie.. if ur innocent, u dont settle People settle out of court for a number of reasons: don't want to fight, court fees, lawyer expenses, etc. MJ was advised to settle for whatever reason. If MJ would have continued, he would have been swimming in bills. Something such as molestation is NEVER a civil matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 How did he get eventually get off, with that kind of evidence. I didnt follow the case. Hold on let me look it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I'm just saying, there's no substantial proof that MJ is a pedophile. I'm not here for speculation and tampered "evidence". There's tape of Roberta slamming underage puss. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h1euQKJsr4&t=2m16s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I don't know much about algebra but I know there's a book called Michael Jakson Conspiracy that goes through the trial in great detailp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 How did he get eventually get off, with that kind of evidence. I didnt follow the case. They couldn't determine if the girl in the tape was underage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrietta. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Your shade on here is to get on my nerves. Not all the time. And why would I? You aren't even a MJ stan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 They couldn't determine if the girl in the tape was underage. I thought the bitch was called to the stand? Wasn't she Sparkle's niece or some shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.