art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I thought the bitch was called to the stand? Wasn't she Sparkle's niece or some shit. No, she didn't take the stand and yes, that's Sparkle's niece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h1euQKJsr4&t=2m16s http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnlysnBdA4#t=2m04s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Not all the time. And why would I? You aren't even a MJ stan LIES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 How did he get eventually get off, with that kind of evidence. I didnt follow the case. He was acquitted. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/14/arts/music/14kell.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnlysnBdA4#t=2m04s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 No, she didn't take the stand and yes, that's Sparkle's niece. So my thing is..how da fuck could they not determine her age? They dont know how to do simple math? Wtf am I missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Poor Sparkle. She tried to come for the King and now can't get a proper album release date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 What's the different between not guilty and innocent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 And there is so much truth in that quote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 So my thing is..how da fuck could they not determine her age? They dont know how to do simple math? Wtf am I missing? The jurors watched the tape and couldn't determine whether she was underage or not. Besides she didn't testify and neither did her family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrietta. Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 LIES. Truth.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 What's the different between not guilty and innocent? Innocent means that a person on trial is innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. I.E. there is no evidence to support the charge. Not guilty means there wasn't/isn't enough evidence to convict someone on trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 Poor Sparkle. She tried to come for the King and now can't get a proper album release date. THat song and video STOPPED THE GAME for a minute!!!! That was my shit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 For OWN/You All Smell: "Remember Evan Chandler? He's the Beverly Hills dentist who several years ago accused pop music superstar Michael Jackson of sexually molesting his then 13-year-old son. Instead of trying to put Jackson in jail, Chandler sought to pick his pocket. The civil suit he filed in 1993 was settled out of court, reportedly for more than $10 million. Now Chandler is hoping for another visit from the tooth fairy. The former dentist to the stars is back in court. And this time he's not just suing Jackson. Chandler also has named the pop music star's ex-wife, Lisa Marie Presley, the Sony Music Corp., the Walt Disney Co. and some 300 unnamed persons as co-conspirators. Aided and abetted by this cast of characters, Jackson violated the terms of their confidential 1994 agreement, Chandler says. How? By denying - in words and song - that he sexually abused the young boy. He did so last year during an interview on ABC with Diane Sawyer, Chandler charges, and again in his latest album. And for that Jackson must pay. How much? Chandler, who between root canals co-wrote the screenplay for the movie Robin Hood: Men in Tights, wants at least $60 million to settle his latest complaint against the pop music king. He also wants an album. Not a copy of HIStory, the Jackson album he cites in his suit. Chandler wants a court order "to allow him to publish and cause to be distributed to the public for sale" his own musical composition - something he calls "EVANstory." -------------------------------------------------------------- Needless to say THAT time he didn't get what he wanted...more money. For the full article: http://site2.mjeol.com/1993-1994/settlement-not-enough-june-24-1996.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Poor Sparkle. She tried to come for the King and now can't get a proper album release date. This is one of three songs I can actually listen to R. Kelly on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 The jurors watched the tape and couldn't determine whether she was underage or not. Besides she didn't testify and neither did her family. From the link Duke posted. 14 witnesses identified da bitch. So I guess that wasn't enough? I swear..the technicalities when it comes to trial proceedings are a muthafuka. We all know damn well Kellz should have been locked da fuck up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Truth.com ...and yes you created the damn gif #homagepaid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 THat song and video STOPPED THE GAME for a minute!!!! That was my shit YES! I love it! and he followed it up with 'When a Woman's Fed Up' Genius. They don't make music like this anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 People settle out of court for a number of reasons: don't want to fight, court fees, lawyer expenses, etc. MJ was advised to settle for whatever reason. If MJ would have continued, he would have been swimming in bills. Something such as molestation is NEVER a civil matter. Ur forgetting that he is the defendant arent the plaintiffs swimming in bills too??? http://www.youtube.c...uQKJsr4&t=2m16s To TOF, clearly this father is mentally ill why do u continue to analyse his comments?> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 This is my question. Okay, the bitch didnt testify..fine but the court couldn't get info on the bitch as far as her AGE (at the moment of the trial)and do simple subtraction of her age as to when the act was recorded back in 99'? Im really tryna understand why this fell through Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetDAYZ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 YES! I love it! and he followed it up with 'When a Woman's Fed Up' Genius. They don't make music like this anymore. "Now..Im at this telephone booth...calling Tyrone" I always thought that Erykah Badu reference was clever to add in there.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 From the link Duke posted. 14 witnesses identified da bitch. So I guess that wasn't enough? I swear..the technicalities when it comes to trial proceedings are a muthafuka. We all know damn well Kellz should have been locked da fuck up! No, it isn't enough. The gal in the tape and her family never came forward. And it didn't help that their were family and friends that said it wasn't her in her tape. So it was all over the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOtherFan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 To TOF, clearly this father is mentally ill why do u continue to analyse his comments?> I'm not analyzing it. Just posting some tidbits concerning the case... and I have more to post too! Like I told dayz, I KNOW my facts concerning this situation. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wonder Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Ur forgetting that he is the defendant arent the plaintiffs swimming in bills too??? Yes and no, but it's really a long explanation to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 "Now..Im at this telephone booth...calling Tyrone" I always thought that Erykah Badu reference was clever to add in there.. It is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.