Reyna ♔ Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 13. Marc Anthony & Dayanara Torres Cost of the wedding: $500,000 Married: December 7, 2002 *This was their vow renewal ceremony after a brief separation. They were originally married in 2000) Divorced: 2004 12. Mariah Carey & Tommy Mottola Cost of Wedding: $500,000 Married: June, 1993 Divorced: 1998 11. Brad Pitt & Jennifer Aniston Cost Of Wedding: $1 Million Married: July 29, 2000 Divorced: March 25, 2005 10. Tori Spelling & Charlie Shanian Cost Of Wedding: $1 Million Married: July 3, 2004 Divorced: April 20, 2006 9. Madonna & Guy Ritchie Cost Of Wedding: $1.5 Million Married: December 22, 2000 Divorced: December 15, 2008 8. Eddie Murphy & Nicole Mitchell Cost Of Wedding: $1.5 Million Married: March 18, 1993 Divorced: April 17, 2006 7. Tiger Woods & Elin Nordegren Cost Of Wedding: $1.5 Million Married: October 5, 2004 Divorced: August 23, 2010 6. Christina Aguilera and Jordan Bratman Cost of Wedding: $2 million Married:November 19, 2005 Divorced: October 14, 2010 5. Elizabeth Taylor & Larry Fortensky Cost Of Wedding: $2 Million Married: October 6, 1991 Divorced:October 31, 1996 4. Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar Cost of Wedding: $2.5 Million Married: March 2, 2007 Divorced: April 2, 2011 3. Paul McCartney and Heather Mills Cost Of Wedding: #3 Million Married: 2002 Divorced: 2008 2. Liza Minnelli & David Gest Cost Of Wedding: $3.2 Million Married: March 16, 2002 Divorced: April 2007 1. Prince Charles and Lady Diana Cost Of Wedding: $48 Million Married: July 29, 1981 Divorced: August 28, 1996 _______________________________ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 If your wedding costs over $50,000 then you're doing too much. There's no need for all the extra shit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Wow....48 million for Charles and Diana? I wonder how much Harry and katherine's cost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Wow....48 million for Charles and Diana? I wonder how much Harry and katherine's cost I've read that it cost between 40-70 million. Smh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 I've read that it cost between 40-70 million. Smh. aint they making their money back though? She has her wedding gown on display for the public to pay to see....kinda tacky I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 aint they making their money back though? She has her wedding gown on display for the public to pay to see....kinda tacky I think I don't think that goes towards the cost of the wedding though. I could be wrong though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 I don't think that goes towards the cost of the wedding though. I could be wrong though. well think about it, they making money right? Off the wedding, the photos, now the dress. Hell they smart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 I've read that it cost between 40-70 million. Smh. It's probably not just the ceremony though - security, travel, hotels etc all add up because kates dress and a few trees in Westminster abbey and a party in Buckingham palace can't cost that much lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 well think about it, they making money right? Off the wedding, the photos, now the dress. Hell they smart I mean the general consensus here is that the wedding was paid by tax payers. Whatever money they get from merchandise and stuff...I don't think that goes anywhere but their own pocket. I'm assuming though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 It's probably not just the ceremony though - security, travel, hotels etc all add up because kates dress and a few trees in Westminster abbey and a party in Buckingham palace can't cost that much lol lmao those trees were the business! But yeah security would have cost a lot. They probably would have footed the bill for hotels for the guests too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 I mean the general consensus here is that the wedding was paid by tax payers. Whatever money they get from merchandise and stuff...I don't think that goes anywhere but their own pocket. I'm assuming though.... OHHHH snap.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 lmao those trees were the business! But yeah security would have cost a lot. They probably would have footed the bill for hotels for the guests too. the need for security is not their fault though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 $48 million dollars of the people's money... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidfresh832 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 $48 million dollars of the people's money... It was a massive worldwide event though people from all around the world were watching, talking about it. Tourism alone benefits from that type of stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bu. Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Tourism is the only reason we can't let the Royals go. Other than that they're useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 All that money for one fuckin day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escapade Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Didn't Elizabeth Taylor & Larry Fortensky get married at Neverland? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyna ♔ Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 Didn't Elizabeth Taylor & Larry Fortensky get married at Neverland? Yup! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 It was a massive worldwide event though people from all around the world were watching, talking about it. Tourism alone benefits from that type of stuff. they coulda had that for a less amount of money. Never in America would we'd allow our tax dollars to waste away for something so pointless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaquero Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Wow....48 million for Charles and Diana? I wonder how much Harry and katherine's cost William not Harry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonofBaldwin Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 If your wedding costs over $50,000 then you're doing too much. There's no need for all the extra shit... If your wedding cost over $500, you're doing too much. You better see the judge and have your momma cook for a couple of people and call it a day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 William not Harry Omg lol - how can I make that mistake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock & Roll Hall of Game Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 If your wedding cost over $500, you're doing too much. You better see the judge and have your momma cook for a couple of people and call it a day! Omg lol - how can I make that mistake because it doesn't matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.