• Announcements

    • Planet Janet Rules   07/07/2015

      General Rules for Planet Janet Welcome to Planet Janet! The main objective of this board is to express your love for Janet, your opinions, and to interact with an important segment of the Janet fandom.  To enjoy your experience here, below are general rules and guidelines to make your experience here be successful: The N Word Please be aware that the N word is going to be filtered on this forum. Most importantly, this word is not acceptable on this forum in any form; therefore, if it is used again by ANY member on here, it will result in an immediate and permanent ban. Consider this the first, only, and last warning regarding this. Music Download | Copyright Infringement Illegal download links to music from any artist are not permissible to be posted on this forum at any time. If you have posted an illegal download link, you must take it down immediately. Failure to remove the links, and/or subsequent, repeated offenses will result in disciplinary action up to and including a permanent ban from the forum. Fan Threads of Other Artists Generally, we like to keep threads and/or topics about other artists within an Official Artist Thread.  This helps to eliminate clutter and redundancy throughout the forum and allow a one-stop shop to view comments on that particular artist not pertaining to Janet.  If there is HUGE news related to an artist and generates a lot of discussion, it is okay to have a standalone thread on that topic outside of the Official Thread. A good debate is OKAY in the Official Threads of other artists.  Official Threads are not complete sanctuaries of devotion of that particular artist; however, there is a need to be civil with other members.  Please refrain from personal attacks and arguments that devolve into personal attacks. Additionally, do NOT use Janet as means to defend an artist.  This forum is made in her honor, and putting her down to boast your particular artist is prohibited. Exercise good judgment and common sense.  If not, then the moderating team will exercise disciplinary action depending on the egregiousness of the action.  Please utilize this announcement as a first warning. Personal Attacks

      Each member has a warning percentage - most of them are at zero right now but a few have been warned before. Each warning is worth 10%, and once it gets to 100% the member is automatically banned from the forum. 

      Each time a member gets into an argument with another member that includes personal attacks, if it is reported or viewed by a member of the moderating team, each participant in the personal attack will get an increase in their warning percentage.  They will be notified via PM, and, prior to posting again, will receive a receipt acknowledging that warning before they can post again. The Moderating Team will never divulge a member's warn percentages on the forum or to other members.

      What this means is you are now responsible for your own future on this forum. The Moderating Team will not keep asking you to stop and being ignored. Learn to let things go and learn to moderate yourself before posting; if you end up banned it will be your own fault. Personal attacks and include attacks on one’s race, age, religious creed, color, gender, national origin, physical, mental or visual disability, medical condition, ancestry, marital and military status, pregnancy or sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and general physical appearance/looks. Depending on the nature of the personal attack there will be corrective action up and including permanent banning. If you have any inquiries about your warning percentage, feel free to PM a mod for an answer. If you need any clarification on the rules, feel free to reach out to The Moderating Team.
       
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Wissam seen with Eissa

32 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

hmm he's always in L.A. which is where he used to run around and be a playboy with his buddies but yeah seems like the paparazzi dgaf about him cause ain't none of them wanted to take snaps of him. I wonder if Janet met up with him to give him Eissa for a bit since she has a show in Anaheim tomorrow. I was gonna say I wonder if he's out in the open with Eissa on purpose so people will recognize him but then maybe he knows nobody either knows or cares who he is. Anyway those look like the same clothes Eissa had on when Janet was with him so I wonder if this happened the same day or the day after?

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

hmm he's always in L.A. which is where he used to run around and be a playboy with his buddies but yeah seems like the paparazzi dgaf about him cause ain't none of them wanted to take snaps of him. I wonder if Janet met up with him to give him Eissa for a bit since she has a show in Anaheim tomorrow. I was gonna say I wonder if he's out in the open with Eissa on purpose so people will recognize him but then maybe he knows nobody either knows or cares who he is. Anyway those look like the same clothes Eissa had on when Janet was with him so I wonder if this happened the same day or the day after?

those are not the same clothes, that looks like a onesie,he had on long pants and a denim  shirt in the pics with janet. I doubt janet personally delivered the baby to him, even when they were in london it appeared the nanny brought the baby to him and stayed while he visited. she probably stays away from him, especially since randy said he was still bothering her while she's on tour.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

this matter concerns me yet again, only because she's on tour and dealing with Wissam could be become difficult, one moment the baby is with Janet, next with Wissam. At least they are on American soil and Janet seems to have Eissa more than Wissam. How do we know where Wissam is? :unsure:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

There's absolutely nothing to be concerned about lol, if Janet can parade Eissa around for the paps then Wissam taking him on a public walk is not a big deal. Janet doesn't seem worried. Despite the public chess they seem to be playing with each other Eissa is Wissams child & he has as much of a right to him as Janet does. Glad to see he's not being deprived of his fatherhood. Makes me respect Janet even more. 

6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

There's absolutely nothing to be concerned about lol, if Janet can parade Eissa around for the paps then Wissam taking him on a public walk is not a big deal. Janet doesn't seem worried. Despite the public chess they seem to be playing with each other Eissa is Wissams child & he has as much of a right to him as Janet does. Glad to see he's not being deprived of his fatherhood. Makes me respect Janet even more. 

I agree, hopefully as time go on they can work out their differences and co-parent lil Eissa. Janet should want her child's father in his life as long as he is a great father to him. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Say what you want but The fact that their issues with each other is not stopping them from taking turns spending time with their child, separately is ..commendable and mature. Something that parents are NOT at all times. 

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

There's absolutely nothing to be concerned about lol, if Janet can parade Eissa around for the paps then Wissam taking him on a public walk is not a big deal. Janet doesn't seem worried. Despite the public chess they seem to be playing with each other Eissa is Wissams child & he has as much of a right to him as Janet does. Glad to see he's not being deprived of his fatherhood. Makes me respect Janet even more. 

I'm not understanding what taking photos outside with Eissa is supposed to do. They are orchestrated but I don't see the point. Janet never goes to the Ivy let alone with a baby. And Wissam is more private than her.  Do courts really view that as good parenting if they see nice pictures 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Say what you want but The fact that their issues with each other is not stopping them from taking turns spending time with their child, separately is ..commendable and mature. Something that parents are NOT at all times. 

My point exactly. Also the fact that Wissam is willing to travel around the world for his, despite being publicly embarrassed by the mother that in itself shows a dedication to his child. 

And the fact that Janet let's the reigns loose for it means she knows beyond all the personal shit he loves his child. She trusts that enough to let it be. Fans might not agree but when adults have disagreements there's usually 3 sides to the story. Both people's side and the truth. Honestly, there could have been times where Janet was COMPLETELY wrong & Wissam was COMPLETELY wrong and times where they just didn't communicate effectively. Instead of immediately seeing him as the villain - I think that's their business. Janet could be playing chess and taking jabs but she knows he loves his son enough to be there for him. No matter what. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm not understanding what taking photos outside with Eissa is supposed to do. They are orchestrated but I don't see the point. Janet never goes to the Ivy let alone with a baby. And Wissam is more private than her.  Do courts really view that as good parenting if they see nice pictures 

You DO know when Janet is spotted out  with Eissa from the lead up of her in the park with him in the stroller to him & her randomly standing on the corner waiting for her lunch meeting to arrive to the store photos - it's ALL purposeful & planned. I don't understand fans trying to demonize Wissam for doing exactly what Janetnis doing. 

Janet has ALWAYS been private. Now she's being more "public" but Wissam & Janet are not so far a part in their privacy ideals. Maybe because he's married to a megastar when he's in public now it's more documented. He could have always had equal amounts of time in the public but paps didn't hound him. Do you ever see pictures of Mark Zuckerberg just out and about? That doesn't mean he barely goes out it just means the paps don't care. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

You DO know when Janet is spotted out  with Eissa from the lead up of her in the park with him in the stroller to him & her randomly standing on the corner waiting for her lunch meeting to arrive to the store photos - it's ALL purposeful & planned. I don't understand fans trying to demonize Wissam for doing exactly what Janetnis doing. 

Janet has ALWAYS been private. Now she's being more "public" but Wissam & Janet are not so far a part in their privacy ideals. Maybe because he's married to a megastar when he's in public now it's more documented. He could have always had equal amounts of time in the public but paps didn't hound him. Do you ever see pictures of Mark Zuckerberg just out and about? That doesn't mean he barely goes out it just means the paps don't care. 

Janet like you said is the megastar in the relationship. She is used to the spotlight and the Paps. That is the world she comes from. Wissam comes from a completely different background. So some fans may find it more odd for him to do this than Janet. I'm just taking all of it in because after this tour she will probably go back into hibernation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm not understanding what taking photos outside with Eissa is supposed to do. They are orchestrated but I don't see the point. Janet never goes to the Ivy let alone with a baby. And Wissam is more private than her.  Do courts really view that as good parenting if they see nice pictures 

its like a campaign, Wendy Williams called it back when they first started, "see look I'm the better parent" ..."no see look I'm the better parent"   ....still not sure as to why she's been at The Ivy so much with Eissa...never been to LA, nor Cali for that matter, but I'm sure there are plenty of other restaurants

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Janet like you said is the megastar in the relationship. She is used to the spotlight and the Paps. That is the world she comes from. Wissam comes from a completely different background. So some fans may find it more odd for him to do this than Janet. I'm just taking all of it in because after this tour she will probably go back into hibernation.

That's honestly just an excuse fans use to dissolve Janet of the same equal judgment. Janet ABSOLUTELY knows a different world of avoiding paps. She does it artfully. She avoided cameras for literally years. She's talked about going to the movies and ppl never being able to tell she's been there. She grew up in this world so she also very skillfully knows how to maneuver through it. 

Her publicity moves are the equivalent of Wissam. Not to mention he's probably ALWAYS been out & about but it wasn't until Janet that he would be stalked for it. He was just an unknown billionaire. Before Janet he would have been a completely unassuming man out pacing with his son & quite honestly to the average person - he still is. You don't see any paparazzi rushing or crowding him like they do Janet. He's ALWAYS without visible security. Fans analyze it to be more because they know him & who he is...whoever walked by him didn't look at him twice. The guy even said - nobody on my Snapchat will know who this is...

Matter of fact, look how everyone is treating him in the vicinity. If that was Janet do you think it would be the same? It's probably more normal for him to be out chilling in plain sight than it would be a megastar like Janet (unfortunately)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

anonymity has its value

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Agreed and he has more than Janet has. So him being out with the child would be considered much more low key. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Agreed and he has more than Janet has. So him being out with the child would be considered much more low key. 

how you been?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Okay :unsure:

No shade but why is this a thread...? Fathers are seen with their children everyday. Should this picture stir up some kind of rage in me as a Janet fan, should I be happy and bask in the adorableness....I'm confused :unsure:

Wheres Tina Landon to make sense of it all?!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Okay :unsure:

No shade but why is this a thread...? Fathers are seen with their children everyday. Should this picture stir up some kind of rage in me as a Janet fan, should I be happy and bask in the adorableness....I'm confused :unsure:

Wheres Tina Landon to make sense of it all?!

well it does answer questions about visitation and I honestly wondered where he was.....that got answered. Look I keep coming back to one thing, no matter what happens with those two, they have a child together now and that means, unlike previous guys Janet spent years with, Wissam is a permanent fixture in her life even if only as the father of her son...she gotta work with that....I thought she was pimp of the year, she saw shit wasn't going right, they talked thought maybe a baby would give their relationship "more" instead shit broke down, it happen, but fuck a pre-nup she got that baby and him gonna pay for that :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

 

its like a campaign, Wendy Williams called it back when they first started, "see look I'm the better parent" ..."no see look I'm the better parent"   ....still not sure as to why she's been at The Ivy so much with Eissa...never been to LA, nor Cali for that matter, but I'm sure there are plenty of other restaurants

It’s not a campaign. And Wendy Williams is hardly right about shit. Fuck her and don’t quote her as a source  

They’re just living their lives except Janet, who enjoys the attention of press and she should.

The Ivy is one of Janet’s favorite someone said

 

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

 

It’s not a campaign. And Wendy Williams is hardly right about shit. Fuck her and don’t quote her as a source  

They’re just living their lives except Janet, who enjoys the attention of press and she should.

The Ivy is one of Janet’s favorite someone said

 

In some ways it very much is a campaign, to win custody, and its back and forth....Wendy Williams may not be the most liked person here, BUT she certainly has the sense to call things as she sees them, so I will continue to quote whomever I see fit to do so. And who is "someone" that said The Ivy is Janet's favorite? Who told you that ? you're not quoting anyone there you're just pulling whatever you have outta ya butt hole

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

In some ways it very much is a campaign, to win custody, and its back and forth....Wendy Williams may not be the most liked person here, BUT she certainly has the sense to call things as she sees them, so I will continue to quote whomever I see fit to do so. And who is "someone" that said The Ivy is Janet's favorite? Who told you that ? you're not quoting anyone there you're just pulling whatever you have outta ya butt hole

Right bc paparazzi photos wins court battles. Taking a child to a park wins court battles. Gtfo 

Wendy is fake news placed on television for stupid noncritical thinkers and messy people. Wendy is equivalent to FOX News. The fact that you believe her speaks volume

She’s visited there twice this year alone. “One of her favorites”. Please don’t misquote me

Edited by State of the Game
-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If Janet wanted to go to the IVY everyday, she has that right.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Right bc paparazzi photos wins court battles. Taking a child to a park wins court battles. Gtfo 

Wendy is fake news placed on television for stupid noncritical thinkers and messy people. Wendy is equivalent to FOX News. The fact that you believe her speaks volume

She’s visited there twice this year alone. “One of her favorites”. Please don’t misquote me

dont tell me tell them that, they seem to think it, as evidenced by their behavior, and plenty of folks on this board said the photos looked staged.

Wendy is a point of view, she gets the tea and interprets it as she sees it, I dont think for one second she was off in saying the photos were "look Im the better parent" thats all that was.

I dont care how many times she's been there, its still interesting that she seems to go there with the baby...and let this be the last exchange on this subject

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

dont tell me tell them that, they seem to think it, as evidenced by their behavior, and plenty of folks on this board said the photos looked staged.

Wendy is a point of view, she gets the tea and interprets it as she sees it, I dont think for one second she was off in saying the photos were "look Im the better parent" thats all that was.

I dont care how many times she's been there, its still interesting that she seems to go there with the baby...and let this be the last exchange on this subject

Oop! :lol: I see you're taking my route and I love it. I don't be having time for the continuous back and forth about how I feel lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Oop! :lol: I see you're taking my route and I love it. I don't be having time for the continuous back and forth about how I feel lol

He tries it, and he'll be back, but I wont, I get tired of the shit, I got other shit to deal with :filenails:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0